Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) · Massachusetts

Courtyard By Marriott

Cambridge, MA · ~80 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Courtyard By Marriott runs at 99% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) workplace, earning a grade C.

Courtyard By Marriott: 3.0 TCR = 99% of Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) BLS 3.0 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Courtyard By Marriott safety composite

Courtyard By Marriott scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Courtyard By Marriott: 3.0 → 62.1 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 62.1 TCR · DART/TCR 20.91× in 2017

Courtyard By Marriott's TCR rose 59.1 from 3.0 in 2016 to 62.1 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 20.91× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Cambridge, MA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 99% of ind

  • DART 62.1 DART
  • RANK #62/204
  • PHOTO Fairfield Inn Chicag…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~80 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fairfield Inn Chicago River N (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Courtyard By Marriott in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Courtyard By Marriott averages 3.0 TCR (99% of the Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Courtyard By Marriott TCR series: 2016=3 · 2017=62.1 · BLS 3.0

Where Courtyard By Marriott falls in its industry

9,342 Hotel management services (i.e establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #62 safest of 204 Hotel management services (i.e employers in Massachusetts.

Courtyard By Marriott (80 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Courtyard By Marriott
Courtyard By Marriott (80 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Courtyard By Marriott has more employees than the Hotel management services (i.e., providi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 62.1 62.1 5 0 0
2016 3.0 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · MA · Cambridge

9,342 Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 149 employers in Cambridge, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fairfield Inn Chicago River N 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Courtyard Boston Cambridge 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Glassboro Courtyard 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spring Hill Suites Carlstadt 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE New England Animal Medical Center 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Cottages at Dartmouth Village 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE KRE-BSL HUSKY LEOMINSTER OPERATION LLC 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE 500105300 WESTERN NEW ENGLAND UNIVERSITY 80 FTE
CITY-NEAR Philips NAM Field Sales & Service 5,136 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vinfen Corporation 2,662 FTE
CITY-NEAR Biogen - Cambridge 2,478 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cambridge Campus 2,473 FTE
NAT-TCR AC Corporation - Winston-Salem 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Dymax Corporation (HQ & Adhesives) 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Duvall Road 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Premier Tooling & Manufacturing, Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Excelsior Springs Nursing and Rehab LLC 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1730 LKQ/Keystone 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Communications Specialists, Inc. 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atlantic Spring 80 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.