Hotels (except casino hotels) · Washington

Courtyard by Marriott Seattle Kirkland

Kirkland, WA · ~33 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Courtyard by Marriott Seattle Kirkland runs at 108% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Hotels (except casino hotels) workplace, earning a grade C.

Courtyard by Marriott Seattle Kirkland: 3.3 TCR = 108% of Hotels (except casino hotels) BLS 3.0 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Courtyard by Marriott Seattle Kirkland safety composite

Courtyard by Marriott Seattle Kirkland scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Courtyard by Marriott Seattle Kirkland held a steady TCR band

Courtyard by Marriott Seattle Kirkland's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 9.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=6.1 · 2020=6.6 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=4.0 · 2023=9.3 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Kirkland, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.3 · 108% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #47/172
  • PHOTO 1314-Autograph Disti…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 1314-Autograph Distil Louisville Dt (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Courtyard by Marriott Seattle Kirkland in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Courtyard by Marriott Seattle Kirkland averages 3.3 TCR (108% of the Hotels (except casino hotels) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Courtyard by Marriott Seattle Kirkland TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=6.1 · 2020=6.6 · 2021=0 · 2022=4 · 2023=9.3 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.0

Where Courtyard by Marriott Seattle Kirkland falls in its industry

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #47 safest of 172 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers in Washington.

Courtyard by Marriott Seattle Kirkland (33 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Courtyard by Marriott Seattle Kirkland
Courtyard by Marriott Seattle Kirkland (33 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Courtyard by Marriott Seattle Kirkland has fewer employees than the Hotels (except casino hotels) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 9.3 0.0 2 0 0
2022 4.0 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 6.6 0.0 1 0 0
2019 6.1 3.0 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · WA · Kirkland

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 110 employers in Kirkland, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 1314-Autograph Distil Louisville Dt 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2554-Jw Indianapolis Dt 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR CTH Claridge House Manager LLC 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 33643 CONRAD INDIANAPOLIS 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Olsen Ag Inc 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Diamondback Acres Inc. 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Washington 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trout Lake Farm West Farm 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Evergreen Hospital Medical Center 4,778 FTE
CITY-NEAR EvergreenHealth 4,731 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Kirkland 778 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kenworth Truck Company - Yarrow Bay 766 FTE
NAT-TCR At Home Stores #176 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR AWI Manufacturing, Inc. 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 8007 Elston 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Reed Minerals - Drakesboro 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Inland Empire Deli Provisions - Front Street 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE RLM General Contractors 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sohacki Industries 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Johnstown 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.