Continuing care retirement communities · Washington

Covenant Living at the Shores

Mercer Island, WA · ~165 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Covenant Living at the Shores runs at 101% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade C.

Covenant Living at the Shores: 3.8 TCR = 101% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Covenant Living at the Shores safety composite

Covenant Living at the Shores scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2019→2024

Covenant Living at the Shores injury rate improved

Covenant Living at the Shores's TCR fell 1.9 from 5.7 in 2019 to 3.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.97× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=5.7 · 2020=3.8 · 2021=4.1 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=4.8 · 2024=3.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Mercer Island, WA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.8 · 101% of ind

  • DART 3.7 DART
  • RANK #17/109
  • PHOTO Friendship Village C…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~165 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Friendship Village Chesterfield (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Covenant Living at the Shores in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Covenant Living at the Shores averages 3.8 TCR (101% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Covenant Living at the Shores TCR series: 2019=5.7 · 2020=3.8 · 2021=4.1 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=4.8 · 2024=3.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Covenant Living at the Shores falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 109 Continuing care retirement com employers in Washington.

Covenant Living at the Shores (165 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Covenant Living at the Shores
Covenant Living at the Shores (165 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Covenant Living at the Shores has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.7 3.7 5 0 0
2023 4.8 3.2 6 0 0
2022 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2021 4.1 0.8 0 5 0
2020 3.8 3.1 5 0 0
2019 5.7 4.8 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · WA · Mercer Island

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 23 employers in Mercer Island, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Friendship Village Chesterfield 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Indianapolis Senior Care, LLC 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Parkside Assisted Living 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR The W Assisted Living at Riverdale 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Milgard Windows & Doors -- Corporate Office / Vinyl Window & Door Manufacturing 165 FTE
STATE-SIZE SGL Carbon 165 FTE
STATE-SIZE Seattle Washington Branch - Pacific Office Automation Inc. 165 FTE
STATE-SIZE Town & Country Market - Bainbridge Island 165 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stroum Jewish Community Center 296 FTE
CITY-NEAR COVENANT SHORES 178 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bayley Construction 174 FTE
CITY-NEAR Innovative Solutions 112 FTE
NAT-TCR Field Operations 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Pelican Parts, LLC 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 4116 Wilkins 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant 770 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dfa-Rbs-Richmond in 165 FTE
NAT-SIZE UA Chicago Club B18 165 FTE
NAT-SIZE 5123 Cb Carlisle Dc 165 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4112 Roosevelt 165 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.