Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · North Carolina

CPI USA NC LLC - Roxboro

Roxboro, NC · ~31 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CPI USA NC LLC - Roxboro runs at 272% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade F.

CPI USA NC LLC - Roxboro: 3.3 TCR = 272% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CPI USA NC LLC - Roxboro safety composite

CPI USA NC LLC - Roxboro scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

CPI USA NC LLC - Roxboro: 7.2 → 12.4 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 12.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2021

CPI USA NC LLC - Roxboro's TCR rose 5.2 from 7.2 in 2016 to 12.4 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Roxboro, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 3.3 · 272% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #17/20
  • PHOTO Medical Area Total E…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Medical Area Total Energy Plant, LLC. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

CPI USA NC LLC - Roxboro in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CPI USA NC LLC - Roxboro averages 3.3 TCR (272% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CPI USA NC LLC - Roxboro TCR series: 2016=7.2 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=12.4 · BLS 1.2

Where CPI USA NC LLC - Roxboro falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 20 Electric power generation, fos employers in North Carolina.

CPI USA NC LLC - Roxboro (31 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate CPI USA NC LLC - Roxboro
CPI USA NC LLC - Roxboro (31 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

CPI USA NC LLC - Roxboro has fewer employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 12.4 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 7.2 3.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · NC · Roxboro

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 46 employers in Roxboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Medical Area Total Energy Plant, LLC. 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dresden Plant 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Basin Electric Power Cooperative - Laramie River Station 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR GENERA SAN JUAN 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Todd Glover Farms Inc 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sunny Creek Farm Inc. 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rowan 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE HENDERSONVILLE OPERATIONS 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR POLYWOOD North Carolina 452 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1288 282 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1288 267 FTE
CITY-NEAR Person Memorial Hospital 262 FTE
NAT-TCR A-1 Enterprises Inc. 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Aro Construction Group Inc 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Americold Springdale, AR 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Dot Transportation, Inc.- University Park 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Volvo of Midlothian 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vertiv Services Inc - Thermal - East Region 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE MBC Management 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Porter W. Yett Co. 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.