Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Arkansas

Craig Box Corporation

Fort Smith, AR · ~22 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Craig Box Corporation runs at 30% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade A.

Craig Box Corporation: 1.0 TCR = 30% of Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Craig Box Corporation safety composite

Craig Box Corporation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.9

2016→2023

Craig Box Corporation injury rate improved

Craig Box Corporation's TCR fell 3.9 from 3.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.9 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Fort Smith, AR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 30% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/25
  • PHOTO Wheat Ridge Container
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Wheat Ridge Container (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

Craig Box Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Craig Box Corporation averages 1.0 TCR (30% of the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Craig Box Corporation TCR series: 2016=3.9 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Craig Box Corporation falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 25 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi employers in Arkansas.

Craig Box Corporation (22 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate Craig Box Corporation
Craig Box Corporation (22 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Craig Box Corporation has fewer employees than the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.9 3.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · AR · Fort Smith

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 249 employers in Fort Smith, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Wheat Ridge Container 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grand Traverse Container-TC 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4198 Ontario Box Plant 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR BCI All-Size Division 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Peco Foods Inc.-Truck Shop 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Morrilton Hatchery 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Berryville Growout 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Thomas B. Fitzhugh Generating Station 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR MERCY HOSPITAL FORT SMITH 1,944 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABB Motors and Mechanical, Inc. - Fort Smith 1,298 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fort Smith - 5713 RS Boreham Jr Street 985 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Health Medical Center - Fort Smith 970 FTE
NAT-TCR Greenwood Laurens Pdca Sc 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Grbr 5615 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #1297 STATESBORO, GA 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Hampton Inn Clinton 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ahoskie Growout Office 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE premier truck group of ardmore 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Calloway's Store 127 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4502/3539 - Valley Truss Reload 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2020, 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.