Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Colorado

Craig Generating Station

Craig, CO · ~236 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Craig Generating Station runs at 217% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade F.

Craig Generating Station: 2.6 TCR = 217% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Craig Generating Station safety composite

Craig Generating Station scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Craig Generating Station: 1.3 → 2.8 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 5.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.65× in 2024

Craig Generating Station's TCR rose 1.5 from 1.3 in 2016 to 2.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 5.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.65× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Craig, CO ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 2.6 · 217% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #10/19
  • PHOTO Eagle Point Power Ge…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 48 inj
  • SIZE ~236 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Eagle Point Power Generation, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Craig Generating Station in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Craig Generating Station averages 2.6 TCR (217% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Craig Generating Station TCR series: 2016=1.3 · 2017=2 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=3 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=5.2 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=2.8 · BLS 1.2

Where Craig Generating Station falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 19 Electric power generation, fos employers in Colorado.

Craig Generating Station (236 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Craig Generating Station
Craig Generating Station (236 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Craig Generating Station has more employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.8 1.7 4 1 0
2023 2.4 0.6 3 1 0
2022 5.2 2.3 8 1 0
2021 2.4 2.4 5 0 0
2020 3.0 1.7 7 0 0
2019 3.2 1.2 8 0 0
2018 1.1 0.4 3 0 0
2017 2.0 0.7 6 0 0
2016 1.3 0.7 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · CO · Craig

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 9 employers in Craig, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Eagle Point Power Generation, LLC 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heorot Power Management, LLC 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wise County Power Company LLC 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lower Mount Bethel Generating Station 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Advance Tank and Construction LLC 236 FTE
STATE-SIZE Peerless Tyre Company 236 FTE
STATE-SIZE CO - Colorado Springs 236 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nexion 236 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 4377 186 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4377 178 FTE
CITY-NEAR 620-00415 88 FTE
CITY-NEAR 102812 - Craig Generating Station - NOx Removal 86 FTE
NAT-TCR Birmingham Fastener & Supply, Inc. 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Cheney Flour Mill 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Sternquist Construction, Inc 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR AmTec 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Beverly Hills 236 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plum Contracting Inc. 236 FTE
NAT-SIZE Permian Basin Materials, LLC 236 FTE
NAT-SIZE Primary Poultry - California MO Plant 236 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.