Commercial printing (except screen, books) · New Hampshire

Crane Security Technologies Inc.

Nashua, NH · ~157 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Crane Security Technologies Inc. runs at 60% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Commercial printing (except screen, books) workplace, earning a grade B.

Crane Security Technologies Inc.: 2.0 TCR = 60% of Commercial printing (except screen, books) BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Crane Security Technologies Inc. safety composite

Crane Security Technologies Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2016→2024

Crane Security Technologies Inc. injury rate improved

Crane Security Technologies Inc.'s TCR fell 1.1 from 3.4 in 2016 to 2.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.4 · 2017=1.3 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=0.7 · 2022=1.9 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Nashua, NH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 60% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/18
  • PHOTO Puritan
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~157 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Puritan (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Hampshire employers → · Look up another →

Crane Security Technologies Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Crane Security Technologies Inc. averages 2.0 TCR (60% of the Commercial printing (except screen, books) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Crane Security Technologies Inc. TCR series: 2016=3.4 · 2017=1.3 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=0.7 · 2022=1.9 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=2.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Crane Security Technologies Inc. falls in its industry

2,001 Commercial printing (except sc establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Hampshire alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 18 Commercial printing (except sc employers in New Hampshire.

Crane Security Technologies Inc. (157 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Crane Security Technologies Inc.
Crane Security Technologies Inc. (157 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Crane Security Technologies Inc. has more employees than the Commercial printing (except screen, book median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.2 0.0 4 0 0
2023 2.3 1.2 3 1 0
2022 1.9 1.9 3 0 0
2021 0.7 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2019 2.7 2.7 4 0 0
2018 2.5 0.6 4 0 0
2017 1.3 0.0 1 1 0
2016 3.4 2.7 3 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · NH · Nashua

2,001 Commercial printing (except screen, books) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,718 rated employers in New Hampshire with headcount on file · 179 employers in Nashua, NH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Puritan 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Allflex 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR digital printing systems 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR ECKART America Corporation 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE 8315 157 FTE
STATE-SIZE 8178 157 FTE
STATE-SIZE 8246 157 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3.05E+16 157 FTE
CITY-NEAR BAE Systems Electronic Systems NHQ/MEC 1,943 FTE
CITY-NEAR Southern New Hampshire Medical Center 1,737 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Joseph Hospital 1,515 FTE
CITY-NEAR BAE Systems Electronic Systems NCA 1,445 FTE
NAT-TCR Central Lake Garage 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Czarnowski-Orlando 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Murfreesboro Hampton Inn 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR J&E Companies, Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Clinton Manor Living Center 157 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Grove Fox Valley 157 FTE
NAT-SIZE General Asphalt Paving Co of Philadelphia 157 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marion Environmental, Inc. 157 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.