Amusement parks (e.g., theme, water) · Florida

Crayola Experience Orlando

Orlando, FL · ~159 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
3.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Crayola Experience Orlando runs at 142% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Amusement parks (e.g., theme, water) workplace, earning a grade D.

Crayola Experience Orlando: 4.4 TCR = 142% of Amusement parks (e.g., theme, water) BLS 3.1 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Crayola Experience Orlando safety composite

Crayola Experience Orlando scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.0

2017→2024

Crayola Experience Orlando injury rate improved

Crayola Experience Orlando's TCR fell 5.0 from 9.3 in 2017 to 4.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 9.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=9.3 · 2018=5.5 · 2019=2.2 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=4.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 713110 · Orlando, FL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.4 · 142% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #14/47
  • PHOTO Frankie's Fun Park o…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~159 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Frankie's Fun Park of Charlotte, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Crayola Experience Orlando in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Crayola Experience Orlando averages 4.4 TCR (142% of the Amusement parks (e.g., theme, water) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Crayola Experience Orlando TCR series: 2017=9.3 · 2018=5.5 · 2019=2.2 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=4.3 · BLS 3.1

Where Crayola Experience Orlando falls in its industry

296 Amusement parks (e.g., theme, establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 47 Amusement parks (e.g., theme, employers in Florida.

Crayola Experience Orlando (159 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 197 employees and a TCR of 6.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 010,00020,00030,00040,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Crayola Experience Orlando
Crayola Experience Orlando (159 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 197 employees and a TCR of 6.3

Crayola Experience Orlando has fewer employees than the Amusement parks (e.g., theme, water) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.3 1.4 3 0 0
2023 1.5 0.0 1 0 0
2022 3.6 3.6 2 0 0
2019 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2018 5.5 1.4 4 0 0
2017 9.3 7.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

713110 · FL · Orlando

296 Amusement parks (e.g., theme, water) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,997 employers in Orlando, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Frankie's Fun Park of Charlotte, LLC 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cameron Run Regional Park 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Coney Island 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR LEGOLAND New York Resort 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE AgMart Produce, Inc. BALM CFL 159 FTE
STATE-SIZE Johnson-Davis Inc 159 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4407_9502 159 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mike Scott Plumbing 159 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Orlando Resort 20,343 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Parks and Resorts : UO 13,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR ADVENTHEALTH ORLANDO 11,412 FTE
CITY-NEAR Florida Hospital Orlando 10,318 FTE
NAT-TCR Lawry's The Prime Rib, Las Vegas 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Hartland Building & Restoration Company 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Millwood, Inc. Florence 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Strohecker Incorporated 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Indiana University Health Paoli Hospital 159 FTE
NAT-SIZE Reynolds Excavation 159 FTE
NAT-SIZE Excel Services, Inc. 159 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tejas Tubular Products - Tubing 159 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.