Crushing, pulverizing, and screening machinery, portable, manufacturing · Oklahoma

CRC Evans Pipeline International

Tulsa, OK · ~91 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CRC Evans Pipeline International runs at 38% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Crushing, pulverizing, and screening machinery, portable, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

CRC Evans Pipeline International: 1.3 TCR = 38% of Crushing, pulverizing, and screening machinery, portable, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CRC Evans Pipeline International safety composite

CRC Evans Pipeline International scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

CRC Evans Pipeline International: 1.0 → 1.5 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 1.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.59× in 2023

CRC Evans Pipeline International's TCR rose 0.5 from 1.0 in 2021 to 1.5 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333120 · Tulsa, OK AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 38% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #3/14
  • PHOTO Paving Products Broo…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~91 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Paving Products Brooklyn Park (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oklahoma employers → · Look up another →

CRC Evans Pipeline International in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CRC Evans Pipeline International averages 1.3 TCR (38% of the Crushing, pulverizing, and screening machinery, portable, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CRC Evans Pipeline International TCR series: 2021=1 · 2023=1.5 · BLS 3.3

Where CRC Evans Pipeline International falls in its industry

400 Crushing, pulverizing, and scr establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oklahoma alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 14 Crushing, pulverizing, and scr employers in Oklahoma.

CRC Evans Pipeline International (91 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 87 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate CRC Evans Pipeline International
CRC Evans Pipeline International (91 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 87 employees and a TCR of 4.0

CRC Evans Pipeline International has more employees than the Crushing, pulverizing, and screening mac median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.5 0.7 1 1 0
2021 1.0 1.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333120 · OK · Tulsa

400 Crushing, pulverizing, and screening machinery, portable, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,320 rated employers in Oklahoma with headcount on file · 1,004 employers in Tulsa, OK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Paving Products Brooklyn Park 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Astec Burlington 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Global Manufacturing 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR PPC - Eugene 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE USA Compression Partners Mid Continent 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cimarron Construction Co. 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE BEI Oklahoma 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE LO07 Tulsa Distribution CTR/Cross Dock 91 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Francis Hospital, Inc. 6,668 FTE
CITY-NEAR H&P IDC - U.S. Land 6,014 FTE
CITY-NEAR TUL-TULSA-MAINTENANCE BASE 5,184 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-TUL-TULSA-TUL-TRML 4,794 FTE
NAT-TCR Western Dairy Transport-Windthorst 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR tkSCS Greenville Containment 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Cox Construction Co. 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR BDP Industries, Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Napa 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rawso Constructors 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Furuno USA, Inc. 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fiber-Line Hatfield 91 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.