Retirement homes with nursing care · Connecticut

Creamery Brook Retirement Village

Brooklyn, CT · ~53 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.9
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Creamery Brook Retirement Village runs at 136% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Retirement homes with nursing care workplace, earning a grade D.

Creamery Brook Retirement Village: 8.9 TCR = 136% of Retirement homes with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Creamery Brook Retirement Village safety composite

Creamery Brook Retirement Village scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2016→2024

Creamery Brook Retirement Village injury rate improved

Creamery Brook Retirement Village's TCR fell 2.0 from 5.3 in 2016 to 3.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 34.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.3 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=3.2 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=34.9 · 2023=13.9 · 2024=3.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Brooklyn, CT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 8.9 · 136% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #112/258
  • PHOTO Oakridge Gardens Nur…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~53 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Oakridge Gardens Nursing Center, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Creamery Brook Retirement Village in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Creamery Brook Retirement Village averages 8.9 TCR (136% of the Retirement homes with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Creamery Brook Retirement Village TCR series: 2016=5.3 · 2017=0 · 2018=3.2 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=34.9 · 2023=13.9 · 2024=3.3 · BLS 6.5

Where Creamery Brook Retirement Village falls in its industry

15,252 Retirement homes with nursing establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #112 safest of 258 Retirement homes with nursing employers in Connecticut.

Creamery Brook Retirement Village (53 employees, TCR 8.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Creamery Brook Retirement Village
Creamery Brook Retirement Village (53 employees, TCR 8.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Creamery Brook Retirement Village has fewer employees than the Retirement homes with nursing care median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.3 0.0 1 0 0
2023 13.9 13.9 2 0 0
2022 34.9 29.9 5 9 0
2021 1.6 0.0 0 5 0
2018 3.2 3.2 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 5.3 5.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · CT · Brooklyn

15,252 Retirement homes with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 6 employers in Brooklyn, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Oakridge Gardens Nursing Center, Inc 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bayshore Pointe Nursing and Rehab Center 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Avera Eureka Health Care 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elkader Care Center 8.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE NA-US-CT-Milford-Cascade Boulevard 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE 662 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rocky Hill 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ulbrich Shaped Wire Inc. 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 5777 284 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5777 267 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pierce Memorial Baptist Home 116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brookln Correctional Institution 111 FTE
NAT-TCR Weaver Superior Walls, LLC 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Avera Eureka Health Care 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Mill Steel Houston 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Square Cow Moovers--North Austin 8.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Acme Concrete Paving, Inc. 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Farmingdale Meat Market, Inc. 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dixie Construction Products, Inc 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ocean Bay Management 53 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.