Printed circuit assemblies manufacturing · Minnesota

Creation Technologies Minnesota Inc

Saint Peter, MN · ~206 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Creation Technologies Minnesota Inc runs at 82% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Printed circuit assemblies manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Creation Technologies Minnesota Inc: 2.7 TCR = 82% of Printed circuit assemblies manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Creation Technologies Minnesota Inc safety composite

Creation Technologies Minnesota Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2017→2021

Creation Technologies Minnesota Inc injury rate improved

Creation Technologies Minnesota Inc's TCR fell 0.6 from 3.3 in 2017 to 2.8 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.5 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.3 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=2.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334418 · Saint Peter, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.7 · 82% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #14/17
  • PHOTO Oncore Manufacturing…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~206 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Oncore Manufacturing LLC-San Marcos (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Creation Technologies Minnesota Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Creation Technologies Minnesota Inc averages 2.7 TCR (82% of the Printed circuit assemblies manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Creation Technologies Minnesota Inc TCR series: 2017=3.3 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=2.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Creation Technologies Minnesota Inc falls in its industry

236 Printed circuit assemblies man establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 17 Printed circuit assemblies man employers in Minnesota.

Creation Technologies Minnesota Inc (206 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Creation Technologies Minnesota Inc
Creation Technologies Minnesota Inc (206 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.3

Creation Technologies Minnesota Inc has more employees than the Printed circuit assemblies manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.8 1.4 6 0 0
2020 1.9 1.2 3 0 0
2019 2.1 1.6 4 0 0
2018 3.5 1.5 7 0 0
2017 3.3 0.6 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334418 · MN · Saint Peter

236 Printed circuit assemblies manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 21 employers in Saint Peter, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Oncore Manufacturing LLC-San Marcos 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR CONTROL TECHNOLOGY INC 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Creation Technologies - Minnesota 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bergquest - A Henkel Company 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Quality Tech Services, LLC 206 FTE
STATE-SIZE Albert Lea - Main Store 206 FTE
STATE-SIZE 8183 206 FTE
STATE-SIZE ISD# 834-Stillwater High School 206 FTE
CITY-NEAR Forensics 954 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alumacraft Boat Company 190 FTE
CITY-NEAR River's Edge Hospital and Clinic 185 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Saint Peter 109 FTE
NAT-TCR Vilutis & Co. Inc. 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Hill Country Bridge 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 4765-MSYCI0745 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Limbach - Southern California 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Strack and Van Til Schererville 206 FTE
NAT-SIZE Supply Chain : Auburn, AL 206 FTE
NAT-SIZE Buckingham Care & Rehabilitation 206 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pittman's Tree & Landscaping, LLC 206 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.