Foam insulation installation · Virginia

Creative Conservation

Name: Creative Conservation Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Ashland, VA · ~39 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

C
Average Safety Record: 3.1
Avg TCR: 2.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Creative Conservation runs at 112% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Foam insulation installation workplace, earning a grade C.

Creative Conservation: 3.1 TCR = 112% of Foam insulation installation BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Creative Conservation safety composite

Creative Conservation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): D 3.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.3

2018→2022

Creative Conservation injury rate improved

Creative Conservation's TCR fell 10.3 from 10.3 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 10.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=10.3 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=2.2 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238310 · Ashland, VA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 112% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #36/52
PHOTO 7
BOOK 4y book
INJ 4 inj
SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 7 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

This site

3.1
7

3.1
Branch Office

3.1
Expert Insulat

3.1
GLI

3.1

What this shows Creative Conservation averages 3.1 TCR (112% of the Foam insulation installation BLS benchmark).

Creative Conservation TCR series: 2018=10.3 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.2 · 2022=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Creative Conservation falls in its industry

1,613 Foam insulation installation establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

Grade C

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #36 safest of 52 Foam insulation installation employers in Virginia.

Creative Conservation (39 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Creative Conservation has fewer employees than the Foam insulation installation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses
2022	0.0	0.0	0	0
2020	2.2	2.2	1	0
2019	0.0	0.0	0	0
2018	10.3	10.3	3	1

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238310 · VA · Ashland

1,613 Foam insulation installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 134 employers in Ashland, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	7	MOBILE, AL	3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Branch Office	AMERICAN FORK, UT	3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Expert Insulation - Rochester #456	ROCHESTER, MN	3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	GLI	INDIANAPOLIS, IN	3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Select Genetics VA Hatch 60 61 62 64 65 66, 950-VA	HARRISONBURG	39 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Utilities - Sewerage Systems	CHESTERFIELD	39 FTE
STATE-SIZE	D.D. Kerns Construction Company, Inc.	COVINGTON	39 FTE
STATE-SIZE	DWATTS Construction LLC	ALEXANDRIA	39 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Amazon Transportation Services : RIC5	Ashland	1,187 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Amazon.com Services LLC - RIC5	Ashland	1,077 FTE
CITY-NEAR	1730 RNDC-ASHLAND	Ashland	486 FTE
CITY-NEAR	4609-1730	Ashland	468 FTE
NAT-TCR	49885 - Lamirada Ca Fac.	La Mirada, CA	3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR	Wegmans Latta Road 064	Rochester, NY	3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR	Gallup COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO.	Gallup, NM	3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR	Bed Bath and Beyond Paramus	Paramus, NJ	3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE	RMA-Rancho Cordova	Rancho Cordova, CA	39 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Procter Gamble Lima OH - BIS	Lima, OH	39 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Millbury Ma Depot	Millbury, MA	39 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Ataraxis, Inc.	Boise, ID	39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.