Address lists commercial printing (except screen) without publishing · Maine

Creative Digital Imaging

Bangor, ME · ~26 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Creative Digital Imaging runs at 85% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Address lists commercial printing (except screen) without publishing workplace, earning a grade C.

Creative Digital Imaging: 2.8 TCR = 85% of Address lists commercial printing (except screen) without publishing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Creative Digital Imaging safety composite

Creative Digital Imaging scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Creative Digital Imaging: 0.0 → 8.1 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 8.1 TCR · DART/TCR 2.9× in 2024

Creative Digital Imaging's TCR rose 8.1 from 0.0 in 2017 to 8.1 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2.9× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Bangor, ME AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 85% of ind

  • DART 8.1 DART
  • RANK #2/10
  • PHOTO LIVERMORE
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LIVERMORE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maine employers → · Look up another →

Creative Digital Imaging in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Creative Digital Imaging averages 2.8 TCR (85% of the Address lists commercial printing (except screen) without publishing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Creative Digital Imaging TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=7.4 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=4.1 · 2023=0 · 2024=8.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Creative Digital Imaging falls in its industry

2,001 Address lists commercial print establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maine alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 10 Address lists commercial print employers in Maine.

Creative Digital Imaging (26 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Creative Digital Imaging
Creative Digital Imaging (26 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Creative Digital Imaging has fewer employees than the Address lists commercial printing (excep median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.1 8.1 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.1 4.1 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 7.4 7.4 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · ME · Bangor

2,001 Address lists commercial printing (except screen) without publishing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,397 rated employers in Maine with headcount on file · 167 employers in Bangor, ME · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LIVERMORE 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR TBG1 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Block Graphics 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gulf Business Forms, Inc. 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Linkletter & Sons Inc. 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE ReGenerate Livermore Falls LLC 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE ReEnergy Stratton LLC 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE CMP - Farmington Service Building 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eastern Maine Medical Center 3,190 FTE
CITY-NEAR Acadia Hospital Corporation 655 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northern Light Acadia Hospital 644 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1856 499 FTE
NAT-TCR C2C Industries, LLC 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 30 Town House Road 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Cofield Soy Crushing 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Airport 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE D1 Woodstock Yard 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE SciCast International Inc. 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gingrich Animal Supply, Inc. 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Berea Store 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.