Skilled Nursing · California

Creekside Rehabilitation and Behavioral Health

Santa Rosa, CA · ~228 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.3
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Creekside Rehabilitation and Behavioral Health runs at 250% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Skilled Nursing workplace, earning a grade F.

Creekside Rehabilitation and Behavioral Health: 16.3 TCR = 250% of Skilled Nursing BLS 6.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Creekside Rehabilitation and Behavioral Health safety composite

Creekside Rehabilitation and Behavioral Health scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−17.9

2020→2024

Creekside Rehabilitation and Behavioral Health injury rate improved

Creekside Rehabilitation and Behavioral Health's TCR fell 17.9 from 22.6 in 2020 to 4.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 36.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.16× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=22.6 · 2021=36.2 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=4.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Santa Rosa, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 16.3 · 250% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #659/739
  • PHOTO 9288-451
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~228 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 9288-451 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Creekside Rehabilitation and Behavioral Health in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Creekside Rehabilitation and Behavioral Health averages 16.3 TCR (250% of the Skilled Nursing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Creekside Rehabilitation and Behavioral Health TCR series: 2020=22.6 · 2021=36.2 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=4.7 · BLS 6.5

Where Creekside Rehabilitation and Behavioral Health falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled Nursing establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #659 safest of 739 Skilled Nursing employers in California.

Creekside Rehabilitation and Behavioral Health (228 employees, TCR 16.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Creekside Rehabilitation and Behavioral Health
Creekside Rehabilitation and Behavioral Health (228 employees, TCR 16.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Creekside Rehabilitation and Behavioral Health has more employees than the Skilled Nursing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.7 2.6 6 3 0
2023 1.6 0.5 1 2 0
2021 36.2 31.2 10 41 1
2020 22.6 17.5 10 21 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · CA · Santa Rosa

15,252 Skilled Nursing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 344 employers in Santa Rosa, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 9288-451 16.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 9288-786 16.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR MediLodge of Tawas City 16.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Katahdin Health Care 16.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Harris Fresh 228 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greencraig B - Environmental Analysis Lab - 01 228 FTE
STATE-SIZE Yukon Plastering, Inc. 228 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Inside Source, Inc. CA 228 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 543 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-02121251 2,209 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2004-00001480 1,970 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA720 SANTA ROSA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL HR 1,806 FTE
NAT-TCR Primrose of Appleton 16.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0027-0027-03247 16.3 TCR
NAT-TCR The Resource Center - Celoron B 16.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Pressure Point Roofing 16.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Suffolk 228 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dexter Laundry Inc 228 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Villas at Sunny Acres 228 FTE
NAT-SIZE Antioch 228 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.