Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · North Carolina

Creekside Terrace

Winston-Salem, NC · ~27 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Creekside Terrace runs at 45% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade A.

Creekside Terrace: 1.7 TCR = 45% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Creekside Terrace safety composite

Creekside Terrace scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.2

2017→2022

Creekside Terrace injury rate improved

Creekside Terrace's TCR fell 10.2 from 10.2 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 10.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=10.2 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Winston-Salem, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.7 · 45% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #21/356
  • PHOTO Scotland House
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Scotland House (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Creekside Terrace in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Creekside Terrace averages 1.7 TCR (45% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Creekside Terrace TCR series: 2017=10.2 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Creekside Terrace falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 356 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in North Carolina.

Creekside Terrace (27 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Creekside Terrace
Creekside Terrace (27 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Creekside Terrace has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 10.2 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NC · Winston-Salem

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 234 employers in Winston-Salem, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Scotland House 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 63043 SUNRISE OF BUCKHEAD 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Coventry Zebulon 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Emerald Village Senior Living 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bissette Farms, Inc 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hyde County Pullet Farm 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hyde County Pullet 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Price Logging Inc 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Forsyth Medical Center 4,906 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Budd Group Janitorial 4,414 FTE
CITY-NEAR Reynolds American Inc. Trade Marketing Services 2,061 FTE
CITY-NEAR Reynolds Marketing Services Company 1,600 FTE
NAT-TCR Atlas Mechanical 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at St Anthony Hosp Chic-Fil-a 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Nike (Digital) - Memphis TN. (SMRU12627) 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Daniels Wv Depot 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Briarcrest Estates 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sun Pacific Farming | Bakersfield Office 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dogwood Estates 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grasslands Estates 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.