Electric power generation, solar · Nevada

Crescent Dunes Solar Energy

Tonopah, NV · ~49 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Crescent Dunes Solar Energy runs at 221% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, solar workplace, earning a grade F.

Crescent Dunes Solar Energy: 2.6 TCR = 221% of Electric power generation, solar BLS 1.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Crescent Dunes Solar Energy safety composite

Crescent Dunes Solar Energy scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Crescent Dunes Solar Energy: 2.1 → 3.0 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 8.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.12× in 2020

Crescent Dunes Solar Energy's TCR rose 0.9 from 2.1 in 2016 to 3.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 8.2 TCR. In 2020, DART was 1.12× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221114 · Tonopah, NV ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 2.6 · 221% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #3/4
  • PHOTO Pensacola Warehouse
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pensacola Warehouse (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nevada employers → · Look up another →

Crescent Dunes Solar Energy in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Crescent Dunes Solar Energy averages 2.6 TCR (221% of the Electric power generation, solar BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Crescent Dunes Solar Energy TCR series: 2016=2.1 · 2017=8.2 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=3 · BLS 1.2

Where Crescent Dunes Solar Energy falls in its industry

157 Electric power generation, sol establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nevada alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Electric power generation, sol employers in Nevada.

Crescent Dunes Solar Energy (49 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 208 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Crescent Dunes Solar Energy
Crescent Dunes Solar Energy (49 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 208 employees and a TCR of 1.2

Crescent Dunes Solar Energy has fewer employees than the Electric power generation, solar median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 8.2 1.6 2 3 0
2016 2.1 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221114 · NV · Tonopah

157 Electric power generation, solar employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,574 rated employers in Nevada with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pensacola Warehouse 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR NY State Solar Queens 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southern Energy Management 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 174 Power Global NorthEast, LLC 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE NV Energy-Carson City 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Reno Division Office 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE HENDERSON OFFICE 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ingredients - Drying - Fallon NV 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raley's 120- Tonopah 38 FTE
NAT-TCR CRS Wholesale 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Kingman Plant 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Premier Estates 511 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 1737 East Seventh Street 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fine Line Production 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tft#518 East Haven Warehouse 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Csrolina Reserve of Hendersonville 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stoneworks LTD - NY 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.