Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) · Pennsylvania

Crescent Park Corporation - E1

Mechanicsburg, PA · ~544 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Crescent Park Corporation - E1 runs at 29% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) workplace, earning a grade A.

Crescent Park Corporation - E1: 1.0 TCR = 29% of Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS 3.4 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Crescent Park Corporation - E1 safety composite

Crescent Park Corporation - E1 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

87/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.6

2016→2024

Crescent Park Corporation - E1 injury rate improved

Crescent Park Corporation - E1's TCR fell 3.6 from 3.9 in 2016 to 0.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.9 · 2017=1.8 · 2018=0.9 · 2019=0.6 · 2020=0.4 · 2021=0.6 · 2022=0.2 · 2023=0.4 · 2024=0.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 452910 · Mechanicsburg, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 29% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/288
  • PHOTO WM 458
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 46 inj
  • SIZE ~544 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: WM 458 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Crescent Park Corporation - E1 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Crescent Park Corporation - E1 averages 1.0 TCR (29% of the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Crescent Park Corporation - E1 TCR series: 2016=3.9 · 2017=1.8 · 2018=0.9 · 2019=0.6 · 2020=0.4 · 2021=0.6 · 2022=0.2 · 2023=0.4 · 2024=0.2 · BLS 3.4

Where Crescent Park Corporation - E1 falls in its industry

8,658 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 288 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food an employers in Pennsylvania.

Crescent Park Corporation - E1 (544 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 245 employees and a TCR of 5.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Crescent Park Corporation - E1
Crescent Park Corporation - E1 (544 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 245 employees and a TCR of 5.3

Crescent Park Corporation - E1 has more employees than the Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.2 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.4 0.2 2 0 0
2022 0.2 0.2 1 0 0
2021 0.6 0.4 3 0 0
2020 0.4 0.4 2 0 0
2019 0.6 0.4 3 0 0
2018 0.9 0.8 5 0 0
2017 1.8 1.3 10 0 0
2016 3.9 3.5 19 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

452910 · PA · Mechanicsburg

8,658 Warehouse clubs (i.e., food and general merchandise) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 219 employers in Mechanicsburg, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR WM 458 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Meijer 108 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Club 308 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Club 102 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE 8401/3070 KAO/Keystone Exeter 544 FTE
STATE-SIZE Watsontown Trucking Company 544 FTE
STATE-SIZE Snyder's Lance Hanover Manufacturing 543 FTE
STATE-SIZE Penelec 546 FTE
CITY-NEAR Naval Support Activity Mechanicsburg PA 2,769 FTE
CITY-NEAR EFC3 740 FTE
CITY-NEAR HARRISBURG (PAMBG) 701 FTE
CITY-NEAR PAMBG - HARRISBURG 606 FTE
NAT-TCR CMC Recycling Augusta 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR KAN 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR ALB 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Heritage Freight Corporate Office 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Daly City 544 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kansas City KS FXFE-KCY 544 FTE
NAT-SIZE West Tennessee Medical Group Inc 544 FTE
NAT-SIZE General Atomics - Gray Butte 544 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.