Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) · Michigan

Crestmont Nursing Care Center

Fenton, MI · ~77 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
7.5
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Crestmont Nursing Care Center runs at 116% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) workplace, earning a grade C.

Crestmont Nursing Care Center: 7.5 TCR = 116% of Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS 6.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Crestmont Nursing Care Center safety composite

Crestmont Nursing Care Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.0

2016→2019

Crestmont Nursing Care Center injury rate improved

Crestmont Nursing Care Center's TCR fell 9.0 from 12.4 in 2016 to 3.5 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 12.4 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.23× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=12.4 · 2017=8.4 · 2018=6.0 · 2019=3.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Fenton, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 7.5 · 116% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #233/471
  • PHOTO LP Columbia KY, LLC-…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~77 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LP Columbia KY, LLC--Summit Manor (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Crestmont Nursing Care Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Crestmont Nursing Care Center averages 7.5 TCR (116% of the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Crestmont Nursing Care Center TCR series: 2016=12.4 · 2017=8.4 · 2018=6 · 2019=3.5 · BLS 6.5

Where Crestmont Nursing Care Center falls in its industry

15,252 Convalescent homes or convales establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #233 safest of 471 Convalescent homes or convales employers in Michigan.

Crestmont Nursing Care Center (77 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Crestmont Nursing Care Center
Crestmont Nursing Care Center (77 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Crestmont Nursing Care Center has fewer employees than the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 3.5 1.7 2 0 0
2018 6.0 4.0 3 0 0
2017 8.4 6.7 5 0 0
2016 12.4 0.0 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · MI · Fenton

15,252 Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 46 employers in Fenton, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LP Columbia KY, LLC--Summit Manor 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rockdale Healthcare 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vienna Springs Health Campus 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hickory Hills Alz 7.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Chippewa County Road Commission 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE M&M Excavating Co., Inc. 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Selge Construction Co., Inc. 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE C & R Electric - Main Office 77 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2693 365 FTE
CITY-NEAR Burgaflex North America 333 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2693 307 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kelsey-Hayes Company-Fenton 252 FTE
NAT-TCR Bearon Manufacturing Inc 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Quakertown Center 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Bay Path Rehab & Nursing Center 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR GLI Distributing 7.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Oregon Roses, Inc. 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Richmond Group Main Office 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE NGC - Savannah Plant 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2253-H4505 77 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.