Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction · Colorado

Crestone Services Group,LLC

Denver, CO · ~358 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Crestone Services Group,LLC runs at 66% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction workplace, earning a grade B.

Crestone Services Group,LLC: 1.8 TCR = 66% of Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Crestone Services Group,LLC safety composite

Crestone Services Group,LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Crestone Services Group,LLC: 1.0 → 2.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 2.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.65× in 2024

Crestone Services Group,LLC's TCR rose 1.9 from 1.0 in 2020 to 2.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.65× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Denver, CO AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 66% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #27/65
  • PHOTO ES Boulos Westbrook …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 41 inj
  • SIZE ~358 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ES Boulos Westbrook C & I (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Crestone Services Group,LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Crestone Services Group,LLC averages 1.8 TCR (66% of the Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Crestone Services Group,LLC TCR series: 2020=1 · 2021=0.7 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=2.9 · BLS 2.8

Where Crestone Services Group,LLC falls in its industry

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communicat establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #27 safest of 65 Utility line (i.e., communicat employers in Colorado.

Crestone Services Group,LLC (358 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Crestone Services Group,LLC
Crestone Services Group,LLC (358 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Crestone Services Group,LLC has more employees than the Utility line (i.e., communication, elect median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.9 1.2 12 0 0
2023 2.3 0.4 11 0 0
2022 2.4 0.6 12 0 0
2021 0.7 0.0 3 0 0
2020 1.0 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · CO · Denver

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 1,757 employers in Denver, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ES Boulos Westbrook C & I 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Zachry Underground Utility Services Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2797_5341 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Michels Power Inc-WI-Lomira 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE DENVER INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (CODIA) 358 FTE
STATE-SIZE Colorado Springs, CO 358 FTE
STATE-SIZE H&P IDC - U.S. Land - Grand Junction 357 FTE
STATE-SIZE Haselden Construction 359 FTE
CITY-NEAR DEN DEN 9,832 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-DEN 6,769 FTE
CITY-NEAR DEN - Airport United Airlines Offices 5,277 FTE
CITY-NEAR CO-01 4,581 FTE
NAT-TCR 7700-7730 Southern Dr Springfield VA 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 1402 Lakeway Dr Lewisville TX 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Calico Cottage, Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Xpress Data Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Smucker's Pet Food and Pet Snacks 358 FTE
NAT-SIZE DC 42 - Nashville 358 FTE
NAT-SIZE Enterprise Parkway 358 FTE
NAT-SIZE Memphis Manufacturing Facility 358 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.