Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) · California

Crittenton Services

Fullerton, CA · ~380 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Crittenton Services runs at 329% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) workplace, earning a grade F.

Crittenton Services: 12.5 TCR = 329% of Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Crittenton Services safety composite

Crittenton Services scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.0

2017→2022

Crittenton Services injury rate improved

Crittenton Services's TCR fell 6.0 from 10.2 in 2017 to 4.3 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 30.8 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=10.2 · 2019=11.1 · 2020=30.8 · 2021=6.2 · 2022=4.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623990 · Fullerton, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 12.5 · 329% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #82/91
  • PHOTO 541111 205015_NR NOR…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 85 inj
  • SIZE ~380 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 541111 205015_NR NORTH REG OHD_234 NORTHEAST RD (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Crittenton Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Crittenton Services averages 12.5 TCR (329% of the Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Crittenton Services TCR series: 2017=10.2 · 2019=11.1 · 2020=30.8 · 2021=6.2 · 2022=4.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Crittenton Services falls in its industry

560 Boys' and girls' residential f establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #82 safest of 91 Boys' and girls' residential f employers in California.

Crittenton Services (380 employees, TCR 12.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 6.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Crittenton Services
Crittenton Services (380 employees, TCR 12.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 6.4

Crittenton Services has more employees than the Boys' and girls' residential facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 4.3 2.1 1 1 0
2021 6.2 6.0 9 16 0
2020 30.8 29.7 25 93 0
2019 11.1 4.5 32 22 0
2017 10.2 3.1 18 25 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623990 · CA · Fullerton

560 Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 167 employers in Fullerton, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 541111 205015_NR NORTH REG OHD_234 NORTHEAST RD 12.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Donald Savio 12.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main Campus 12.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heartland Ranch Inc. 12.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Packing Shed 380 FTE
STATE-SIZE J.A.C. Ag Services, Inc 380 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vanir Construction Management 380 FTE
STATE-SIZE BENTLEY Mills 380 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA692 ST JUDE MEDICAL CENTER HR 2,718 FTE
CITY-NEAR SASCO 705 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Fullerton 692 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fullerton / Orange 636 FTE
NAT-TCR 6925-PDX 12.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 2073-SW-20730040-CS 12.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 036367-Phoenix Az Vmf 12.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 288262-Warrenton Po 12.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Denver Area Office 380 FTE
NAT-SIZE NSVLTNHQ - BellSouth Telecommunications, LLC 380 FTE
NAT-SIZE MMPKTNFZ - AT&T Mobility Services LLC 380 FTE
NAT-SIZE Caro Reg Comm Hlth - Dhhs 380 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.