healthcare facility · Florida

Cross City Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Cross City, FL · ~63 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cross City Nursing and Rehabilitation Center runs at 176% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical healthcare facility workplace, earning a grade D.

Cross City Nursing and Rehabilitation Center: 6.7 TCR = 176% of healthcare facility BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cross City Nursing and Rehabilitation Center safety composite

Cross City Nursing and Rehabilitation Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.2

2016→2019

Cross City Nursing and Rehabilitation Center injury rate improved

Cross City Nursing and Rehabilitation Center's TCR fell 9.2 from 9.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 10.9 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.2 · 2017=10.9 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621999 · Cross City, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.7 · 176% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/17
  • PHOTO Avalon Health Care S…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Avalon Health Care San Andreas (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Cross City Nursing and Rehabilitation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cross City Nursing and Rehabilitation Center averages 6.7 TCR (176% of the healthcare facility BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cross City Nursing and Rehabilitation Center TCR series: 2016=9.2 · 2017=10.9 · 2019=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Cross City Nursing and Rehabilitation Center falls in its industry

461 healthcare facility establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 17 healthcare facility employers in Florida.

Cross City Nursing and Rehabilitation Center (63 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Cross City Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Cross City Nursing and Rehabilitation Center (63 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Cross City Nursing and Rehabilitation Center has fewer employees than the healthcare facility median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 10.9 10.9 7 0 0
2016 9.2 4.1 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621999 · FL · Cross City

461 healthcare facility employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 7 employers in Cross City, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Avalon Health Care San Andreas 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR St Johns Regional Medical Center EM 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR St Joseph Health St Mary EM 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 5085 - OR Clackamas 6.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Alliance Grazing 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Port Everglades Plant 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE PCC Plant - Cape Canaveral 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Florida Public Utilities - Debary 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR Suwannee Lumber Company 290 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cross City Lumber 141 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Mulch & Soil Co. Cross City 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR Land's Palm Trees, Inc. 40 FTE
NAT-TCR Plants 3 and 5 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Amscan Kookaburra, Inc. 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR General Motors Components Holdings- Lockport, NY 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Ridge Corporation - Pataskala 6.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Grove #515 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Contract Exteriors LLC 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE GLC LaPorte 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE MN,THIEF RIVER FALLS - Downtown Campus - Psychiatric and Substance Abuse Hospitals 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.