Motor freight carrier, general, local · North Dakota

CrossCountry Freight Solutions - Bismarck

Bismarck, ND · ~27 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CrossCountry Freight Solutions - Bismarck runs at 72% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Motor freight carrier, general, local workplace, earning a grade B.

CrossCountry Freight Solutions - Bismarck: 3.3 TCR = 72% of Motor freight carrier, general, local BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CrossCountry Freight Solutions - Bismarck safety composite

CrossCountry Freight Solutions - Bismarck scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

CrossCountry Freight Solutions - Bismarck: 4.7 → 5.1 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 5.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.56× in 2018

CrossCountry Freight Solutions - Bismarck's TCR rose 0.4 from 4.7 in 2016 to 5.1 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 1.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484110 · Bismarck, ND AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.3 · 72% of ind

  • DART 5.1 DART
  • RANK #7/18
  • PHOTO Innovative Intermodal
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Innovative Intermodal (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Dakota employers → · Look up another →

CrossCountry Freight Solutions - Bismarck in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CrossCountry Freight Solutions - Bismarck averages 3.3 TCR (72% of the Motor freight carrier, general, local BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CrossCountry Freight Solutions - Bismarck TCR series: 2016=4.7 · 2017=0 · 2018=5.1 · BLS 4.5

Where CrossCountry Freight Solutions - Bismarck falls in its industry

2,784 Motor freight carrier, general establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Dakota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 18 Motor freight carrier, general employers in North Dakota.

CrossCountry Freight Solutions - Bismarck (27 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate CrossCountry Freight Solutions - Bismarck
CrossCountry Freight Solutions - Bismarck (27 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.7

CrossCountry Freight Solutions - Bismarck has fewer employees than the Motor freight carrier, general, local median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 5.1 5.1 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 4.7 4.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484110 · ND · Bismarck

2,784 Motor freight carrier, general, local employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,696 rated employers in North Dakota with headcount on file · 188 employers in Bismarck, ND · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Innovative Intermodal 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR PROS LOGISTICS INC 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR BWI - Baltimore 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR MEMPHIS MELTECH (TNMEB) 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ovintiv USA Inc. - Williston Operations 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grand Forks Service Center 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Montana Dakota Utilities - Williston, ND(2) 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Swanberg Construction, Inc. 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR ND,Bismarck-Medical Center-General Medical And Surgical Hospitals 2,764 FTE
CITY-NEAR ND,BISMARCK - Medical Center Campus - General Medical and Surgical Hospitals 1,715 FTE
CITY-NEAR 33180001-331801 ST ALEXIUS MEDICAL CENTER DBA CHI ST ALE 1,303 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bobcat Doosan Bismarck 1,206 FTE
NAT-TCR Prince Minerals LLC- Leesburg 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR EC043 - Nashville, TN-0400 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Salt Lake City (Utltc) 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Eversource - Newtown Gas 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Okc #97 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Crossroads Inn 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lehigh Valley Hospital - Hazleton - LVH-H - Home Care 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE TR005 - Moultrie, GA 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.