Clinics/centers of health practitioners from more than one industry practicing within the same establishment · California

Crossover @ Frederick

Moreno Valley, CA · ~29 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Crossover @ Frederick runs at 60% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Clinics/centers of health practitioners from more than one industry practicing within the same establishment workplace, earning a grade B.

Crossover @ Frederick: 2.3 TCR = 60% of Clinics/centers of health practitioners from more than one industry practicing within the same establishment BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Crossover @ Frederick safety composite

Crossover @ Frederick scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Crossover @ Frederick: 0.0 → 4.6 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 4.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2023

Crossover @ Frederick's TCR rose 4.6 from 0.0 in 2021 to 4.6 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621498 · Moreno Valley, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 60% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #17/132
  • PHOTO HealthPoint Family C…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HealthPoint Family Care Newport (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Crossover @ Frederick in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Crossover @ Frederick averages 2.3 TCR (60% of the Clinics/centers of health practitioners from more than one industry practicing within the same establishment BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Crossover @ Frederick TCR series: 2021=0 · 2023=4.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Crossover @ Frederick falls in its industry

599 Clinics/centers of health prac establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 132 Clinics/centers of health prac employers in California.

Crossover @ Frederick (29 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Crossover @ Frederick
Crossover @ Frederick (29 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Crossover @ Frederick has fewer employees than the Clinics/centers of health practitioners median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.6 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621498 · CA · Moreno Valley

599 Clinics/centers of health practitioners from more than one industry practicing within the same establishment employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 156 employers in Moreno Valley, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HealthPoint Family Care Newport 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sutter Outpatient Services, LLC (600-23) 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Milford Medical Center 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sutter Outpatient Services (30679) 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sean V. Doherty Farms 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blanco Farms, LLC 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SHOP 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cottonwood Farms 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : ONT8 2,866 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - ONT8 2,823 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : ONT6 2,547 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - ONT6 2,260 FTE
NAT-TCR Kleet Lumber Co., Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Operations - Washington, IL 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Kwik Fill M001/197 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Jewish Federation of Omaha 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Jbc Nj 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eastern Metal Supply Missouri 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Yukon Equipment 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Beltrami County Judicial Center 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.