Spring waters, purifying and bottling · Pennsylvania

Crossroads Beverage Group, LLC

Reading, PA · ~114 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Crossroads Beverage Group, LLC runs at 125% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Spring waters, purifying and bottling workplace, earning a grade D.

Crossroads Beverage Group, LLC: 4.1 TCR = 125% of Spring waters, purifying and bottling BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Crossroads Beverage Group, LLC safety composite

Crossroads Beverage Group, LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.4

2016→2024

Crossroads Beverage Group, LLC injury rate improved

Crossroads Beverage Group, LLC's TCR fell 5.4 from 8.3 in 2016 to 2.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 8.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.3 · 2017=3.2 · 2018=4.2 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=7.1 · 2022=2.0 · 2023=3.7 · 2024=2.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 312112 · Reading, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.1 · 125% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #13/24
  • PHOTO Premium Waters - Pit…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 38 inj
  • SIZE ~114 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Premium Waters - Pittsfield (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Crossroads Beverage Group, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Crossroads Beverage Group, LLC averages 4.1 TCR (125% of the Spring waters, purifying and bottling BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Crossroads Beverage Group, LLC TCR series: 2016=8.3 · 2017=3.2 · 2018=4.2 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=7.1 · 2022=2 · 2023=3.7 · 2024=2.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Crossroads Beverage Group, LLC falls in its industry

192 Spring waters, purifying and b establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 24 Spring waters, purifying and b employers in Pennsylvania.

Crossroads Beverage Group, LLC (114 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 98 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Crossroads Beverage Group, LLC
Crossroads Beverage Group, LLC (114 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 98 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Crossroads Beverage Group, LLC has more employees than the Spring waters, purifying and bottling median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.9 2.9 3 0 0
2023 3.7 2.8 2 2 0
2022 2.0 2.0 2 0 0
2021 7.1 2.0 7 0 0
2020 1.7 0.0 2 0 0
2019 3.8 3.0 5 0 0
2018 4.2 1.7 5 0 0
2017 3.2 1.6 4 0 0
2016 8.3 5.0 8 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

312112 · PA · Reading

192 Spring waters, purifying and bottling employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 303 employers in Reading, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Premium Waters - Pittsfield 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Misty Mountain Spring Water Company, L.L.C 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lindenhurst 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Culligan of Covina 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE TerrAscend-Ilera Health Care 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pittsburgh Operations 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE Danella Line Services, Inc. 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE PAGODA ELECTRICAL INC 114 FTE
CITY-NEAR READING HOSPITAL 5,693 FTE
CITY-NEAR SAO : Reading 2,203 FTE
CITY-NEAR A077 - Penn State Health St. Joseph Medical Center 1,764 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - TEN1 1,261 FTE
NAT-TCR Inver Grove Heights Lube Plant 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Anchorage AK Millwork 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Glenview 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Wisconsin Plastics 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Carle Place 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0532 Larchmont 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE C005 Cleveland 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Metal Finishing 114 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.