Construction management, water and sewer line · Minnesota

Crow River Construction LLC

New London, MN · ~44 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Crow River Construction LLC runs at 113% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Construction management, water and sewer line workplace, earning a grade C.

Crow River Construction LLC: 3.2 TCR = 113% of Construction management, water and sewer line BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Crow River Construction LLC safety composite

Crow River Construction LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Crow River Construction LLC: 0.0 → 4.7 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 5.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.5× in 2024

Crow River Construction LLC's TCR rose 4.7 from 0.0 in 2020 to 4.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 5.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · New London, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.2 · 113% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #14/32
  • PHOTO Horizontal Boring & …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Horizontal Boring & Tunneling Co. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Crow River Construction LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Crow River Construction LLC averages 3.2 TCR (113% of the Construction management, water and sewer line BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Crow River Construction LLC TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=5.6 · 2022=0 · 2023=5.5 · 2024=4.7 · BLS 2.8

Where Crow River Construction LLC falls in its industry

1,614 Construction management, water establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 32 Construction management, water employers in Minnesota.

Crow River Construction LLC (44 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Crow River Construction LLC
Crow River Construction LLC (44 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Crow River Construction LLC has fewer employees than the Construction management, water and sewer median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.7 1.6 3 0 0
2023 5.5 3.7 3 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 5.6 5.6 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · MN · New London

1,614 Construction management, water and sewer line employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 16 employers in New London, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Horizontal Boring & Tunneling Co. 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR LaTour Construction Inc. 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Swengel-Robbins Inc. 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Moss Utilities 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE West River 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Monticello Training Ctr-LL 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Water Treatment Facility 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE WasteWater Treatment Facility 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR New London-Spicer Schools 115 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palmer Bus Service of New London-Spicer, Inc. 72 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of New London 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prairie Woods Elementary 50 FTE
NAT-TCR Flatrock Bridge Group 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR TSYS - Columbus North Center 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Comau Dearborn 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Integrated Marine Services Inc. 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Integrated Power Services Shreveport Service Center 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Intra Aerospace 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sioux Corporation 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE River Stone Construction, Inc. 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.