Forklift repair and maintenance services · New Jersey

Crown Lift Trucks New Jersey

Oakland, NJ · ~67 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.0
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Crown Lift Trucks New Jersey runs at 240% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Forklift repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade F.

Crown Lift Trucks New Jersey: 5.0 TCR = 240% of Forklift repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Crown Lift Trucks New Jersey safety composite

Crown Lift Trucks New Jersey scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Crown Lift Trucks New Jersey: 6.7 → 9.3 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 9.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.84× in 2024

Crown Lift Trucks New Jersey's TCR rose 2.6 from 6.7 in 2016 to 9.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 9.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.84× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Oakland, NJ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.0 · 240% of ind

  • DART 9.3 DART
  • RANK #38/47
  • PHOTO WM 9301
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~67 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: WM 9301 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Crown Lift Trucks New Jersey in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Crown Lift Trucks New Jersey averages 5.0 TCR (240% of the Forklift repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Crown Lift Trucks New Jersey TCR series: 2016=6.7 · 2017=9.8 · 2018=0 · 2019=4.6 · 2020=3.1 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=7.8 · 2024=9.3 · BLS 2.1

Where Crown Lift Trucks New Jersey falls in its industry

2,560 Forklift repair and maintenanc establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #38 safest of 47 Forklift repair and maintenanc employers in New Jersey.

Crown Lift Trucks New Jersey (67 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Crown Lift Trucks New Jersey
Crown Lift Trucks New Jersey (67 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Crown Lift Trucks New Jersey has more employees than the Forklift repair and maintenance services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.3 9.3 7 0 0
2023 7.8 7.8 6 0 0
2022 2.6 2.6 2 0 0
2021 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2020 3.1 3.1 2 0 0
2019 4.6 4.6 3 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 9.8 9.8 6 0 0
2016 6.7 5.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · NJ · Oakland

2,560 Forklift repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 19 employers in Oakland, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR WM 9301 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-NY/NJ District : SVC-Long Island City NY-USA 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR ANC ASA 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crown Lift Trucks San Antonio 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gloucester 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atlantic Capes Fisheries 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Duke Farms Foundation 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE PSEG Power ER&T 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR 40 Potash Rd 284 FTE
CITY-NEAR ShopRite of Long Hill Plaza 216 FTE
CITY-NEAR Oakland operator LLC 213 FTE
CITY-NEAR Oakland 97 FTE
NAT-TCR Morehead Division 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Harker Heights Store #2404 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Darlington 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR At Home Stores #18 5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Burt Lumber 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Best Way Disposal Inc., Kalamazoo 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Friction Technologies 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grady Electric Membership Corporation 67 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.