Inhibitors (e.g., corrosion, oxidation, polymerization) manufacturing · Indiana

Crown Technology, Inc.

Indianapolis, IN · ~34 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Crown Technology, Inc. runs at 213% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Inhibitors (e.g., corrosion, oxidation, polymerization) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Crown Technology, Inc.: 7.0 TCR = 213% of Inhibitors (e.g., corrosion, oxidation, polymerization) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Crown Technology, Inc. safety composite

Crown Technology, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.1

2017→2024

Crown Technology, Inc. injury rate improved

Crown Technology, Inc.'s TCR fell 10.1 from 10.1 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 14.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=10.1 · 2018=10.3 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=3.2 · 2022=14.9 · 2023=11.3 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325998 · Indianapolis, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.0 · 213% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #12/14
  • PHOTO Cross Technologies G…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cross Technologies Group, Inc. (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Crown Technology, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Crown Technology, Inc. averages 7.0 TCR (213% of the Inhibitors (e.g., corrosion, oxidation, polymerization) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Crown Technology, Inc. TCR series: 2017=10.1 · 2018=10.3 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=3.2 · 2022=14.9 · 2023=11.3 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Crown Technology, Inc. falls in its industry

485 Inhibitors (e.g., corrosion, o establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 14 Inhibitors (e.g., corrosion, o employers in Indiana.

Crown Technology, Inc. (34 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Crown Technology, Inc.
Crown Technology, Inc. (34 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Crown Technology, Inc. has fewer employees than the Inhibitors (e.g., corrosion, oxidation, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 11.3 2.8 4 0 0
2022 14.9 0.0 5 0 0
2021 3.2 0.0 1 0 0
2020 3.3 3.3 1 0 0
2019 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2018 10.3 0.0 3 0 0
2017 10.1 3.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325998 · IN · Indianapolis

485 Inhibitors (e.g., corrosion, oxidation, polymerization) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 2,074 employers in Indianapolis, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cross Technologies Group, Inc. 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Airosol Co. Inc. 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Highline Warren Wilmington 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chase Hickory-Stewart Superabsorbents 6.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE 118-NiSource-Hammond IN-CISC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Heartland REMC - Markle District 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE 220-NiSource-Gary IN-GM&T 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ardizzone Enterprises Inc 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health, Inc 7,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eli Lilly - Lilly Corp Center 6,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Technology Center 6,472 FTE
NAT-TCR Semo Milling LLC 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR FV St. John's Hospital 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Avamere at South Hill 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 179 7.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ralston Soy 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coral Marine Services, LLC 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Blacktop Maintenance Corp. 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE 268 Oxnard 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.