Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Indiana

CrownPointe of Portland

Portland, IN · ~21 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CrownPointe of Portland runs at 96% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

CrownPointe of Portland: 3.6 TCR = 96% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CrownPointe of Portland safety composite

CrownPointe of Portland scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

CrownPointe of Portland held a steady TCR band

CrownPointe of Portland's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 21.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=21.8 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Portland, IN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.6 · 96% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #33/133
  • PHOTO Barrington Of Oakley
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Barrington Of Oakley (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

CrownPointe of Portland in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CrownPointe of Portland averages 3.6 TCR (96% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CrownPointe of Portland TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=21.8 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where CrownPointe of Portland falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #33 safest of 133 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Indiana.

CrownPointe of Portland (21 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate CrownPointe of Portland
CrownPointe of Portland (21 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

CrownPointe of Portland has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 21.8 14.5 1 2 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · IN · Portland

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 23 employers in Portland, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Barrington Of Oakley 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Richmond Terrace 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Darien 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Solstice Senior Living at Austin 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eastside Dairy, LLC 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Deer Ridge 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Indiana Sow Farm 5 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Indiana Sow Farm 3 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mexican Original Portland Plnt 532 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2388 251 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2388 222 FTE
CITY-NEAR ATI Forged Products 166 FTE
NAT-TCR South Valley Farms 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Glenn Valley Foods 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Southern Motion Plant 1 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Morrison Textile Machinery Company 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - Laurel 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Horizon 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - Richmond Warehouse 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - San Marcos 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.