Injection molding machinery for plastics manufacturing · Michigan

CS Tool Engineering, Inc.

Name: CS Tool Engineering, Inc. Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Cedar Springs, MI · ~47 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

A
Excellent Safety Record: 1.3
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CS Tool Engineering, Inc. runs at 38% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Injection molding machinery for plastics manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

CS Tool Engineering, Inc.: 1.3 TCR = 38% of Injection molding machinery for plastics manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CS Tool Engineering, Inc. safety composite

CS Tool Engineering, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): B 1.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2017→2023

CS Tool Engineering, Inc. injury rate improved

CS Tool Engineering, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.9 from 1.9 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.9 · 2020=1.8 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333249 · Cedar Springs, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 38% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #6/42
PHOTO Custom-1
BOOK 3y book
INJ 2 inj
SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Custom-1 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

This site

1.3
Custom-1

1.3
MAAG Reduction

1.3
INDCO INC

1.3
Fathom / Hartl

1.2

What this shows CS Tool Engineering, Inc. averages 1.3 TCR (38% of the Injection molding machinery for plastics manufacturing BLS benchmark).

CS Tool Engineering, Inc. TCR series: 2017=1.9 · 2020=1.8 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where CS Tool Engineering, Inc. falls in its industry

448 Injection molding machinery fo establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

Grade A

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 42 Injection molding machinery fo employers in Michigan.

CS Tool Engineering, Inc. (47 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.0

CS Tool Engineering, Inc. has fewer employees than the Injection molding machinery for plastics median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2023	0.0	0.0	0
2020	1.8	0.0	1
2017	1.9	1.9	1

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333249 · MI · Cedar Springs

448 Injection molding machinery for plastics manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 26 employers in Cedar Springs, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Custom-1	PHILLIPS, WI	1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	MAAG Reduction, Inc.	KENT, OH	1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Fathom / Hartland	HARTLAND, WI	1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	INDCO INC	NEW ALBANY, IN	1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Nash Greenhouses, LLC	KALAMAZOO	47 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Red Arrow Dairy	GRAND RAPIDS	47 FTE
STATE-SIZE	SEMCO Energy Gas Company - BC	BATTLE CREEK	47 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Operations and Maintenance	FLINT	47 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Cedar Springs Public Schools-41070	Cedar Springs	369 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Cedar Springs Public Schools	Cedar Springs	353 FTE
CITY-NEAR	CS Manufacturing	Cedar Springs	340 FTE
CITY-NEAR	248 - Solon Township MI	Cedar Springs	300 FTE
NAT-TCR	Advanced Door Service	Hatfield, PA	1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	Christman Cable Inc	Belton, TX	1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	TRI Pointe Homes CO	Denver, CO	1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	Ducommun - Berryville	Berryville, AR	1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Le Merdien bythe Galleria Dallas	Dallas, TX	47 FTE
NAT-SIZE	22017 - Rochester	Rochester, WA	47 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Fire Station	Shakopee, MN	47 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Pizza Blends Inc - Portland	Portland, OR	47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2020, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.