Skilled nursing facilities · Connecticut

CSC Enterprises, Incorporated d/b/a

Branford, CT · ~221 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.6
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CSC Enterprises, Incorporated d/b/a runs at 240% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

CSC Enterprises, Incorporated d/b/a: 15.6 TCR = 240% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CSC Enterprises, Incorporated d/b/a safety composite

CSC Enterprises, Incorporated d/b/a scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.9

2016→2021

CSC Enterprises, Incorporated d/b/a injury rate improved

CSC Enterprises, Incorporated d/b/a's TCR fell 5.9 from 16.8 in 2016 to 10.9 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 32.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=16.8 · 2017=13.5 · 2018=8.9 · 2019=10.5 · 2020=32.9 · 2021=10.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Branford, CT ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 15.6 · 240% of ind

  • DART 8.2 DART
  • RANK #206/258
  • PHOTO MaineGeneral Rehab L…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 132 inj
  • SIZE ~221 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MaineGeneral Rehab Long Term Care Gray Birch (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

CSC Enterprises, Incorporated d/b/a in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CSC Enterprises, Incorporated d/b/a averages 15.6 TCR (240% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CSC Enterprises, Incorporated d/b/a TCR series: 2016=16.8 · 2017=13.5 · 2018=8.9 · 2019=10.5 · 2020=32.9 · 2021=10.9 · BLS 6.5

Where CSC Enterprises, Incorporated d/b/a falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #206 safest of 258 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Connecticut.

CSC Enterprises, Incorporated d/b/a (221 employees, TCR 15.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate CSC Enterprises, Incorporated d/b/a
CSC Enterprises, Incorporated d/b/a (221 employees, TCR 15.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

CSC Enterprises, Incorporated d/b/a has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 10.9 8.2 16 0 0
2020 32.9 29.8 20 33 0
2019 10.5 6.5 21 0 0
2018 8.9 7.4 17 1 0
2017 13.5 10.1 27 1 0
2016 16.8 12.4 31 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · CT · Branford

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 75 employers in Branford, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MaineGeneral Rehab Long Term Care Gray Birch 15.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fargo Health Center 15.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Broadfield Care Center 15.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wintersong Village Nursing 15.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Stafford Springs 221 FTE
STATE-SIZE Norbert E. Mitchell Co., Inc. 221 FTE
STATE-SIZE Limpiex Cleaning Service Inc 221 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hartford Operations 221 FTE
CITY-NEAR Branford Public Schools 577 FTE
CITY-NEAR Branford High School 244 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Connecticut Hospice 212 FTE
CITY-NEAR ARK Healthcare & Rehabilitation at Branford Hills 203 FTE
NAT-TCR Goodwill Industries of Denver Kearney 15.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Broadfield Care Center 15.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 2073-SW-20730078-CS 15.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 287134-Saint Joseph Po 15.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE S&D Coffee & Tea-Commercial Park 221 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northwest Door Puyallup 221 FTE
NAT-SIZE Houston, TX 221 FTE
NAT-SIZE Unit 1 221 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.