Industrial research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology and nanotechnology research and development) · Minnesota

CSH Minnesota Site

Oakdale, MN · ~60 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CSH Minnesota Site runs at 154% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Industrial research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology and nanotechnology research and development) workplace, earning a grade D.

CSH Minnesota Site: 0.8 TCR = 154% of Industrial research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology and nanotechnology research and development) BLS 0.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CSH Minnesota Site safety composite

CSH Minnesota Site scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 0.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

CSH Minnesota Site held a steady TCR band

CSH Minnesota Site's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 3.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=0.0 · 2021=3.1 · 2022=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541715 · Oakdale, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 0.8 · 154% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/4
  • PHOTO MycoWorks SC
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MycoWorks SC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

CSH Minnesota Site in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CSH Minnesota Site averages 0.8 TCR (154% of the Industrial research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology and nanotechnology research and development) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CSH Minnesota Site TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=3.1 · 2022=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 0.5

Where CSH Minnesota Site falls in its industry

47 Industrial research and develo establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 4 Industrial research and develo employers in Minnesota.

CSH Minnesota Site (60 employees, TCR 0.8) among 22 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 232 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 23 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05,00010,00015,00020,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate CSH Minnesota Site
CSH Minnesota Site (60 employees, TCR 0.8) among 22 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 232 employees and a TCR of 0.9

CSH Minnesota Site has fewer employees than the Industrial research and development labo median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.1 3.1 0 1 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541715 · MN · Oakdale

47 Industrial research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology and nanotechnology research and development) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 74 employers in Oakdale, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MycoWorks SC 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR General Atomics - Torrey Pines 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR AL - Huntsville - 310 Bob Heath Drive 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sparks 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Living Greens Farm 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Sweden Dairy 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Customer Service Support 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Twin Cities Specialties 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mulcahy Nickolaus LLC 306 FTE
CITY-NEAR Oakdale - Main Store 270 FTE
CITY-NEAR 11762 Oakdale 231 FTE
CITY-NEAR MOAK - Oakdale Manufacturing 208 FTE
NAT-TCR Abuelito Meat Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Beauty Pools, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Metro Place Office Building 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Ensign Well Services - California 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gunthorpe Plumbing and Heating 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE York - 105 Willow Springs Lane 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE CA - Kidde 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ameriflight, LLC- Portland 60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.