Irradiation apparatus and tubes (e.g., industrial, medical diagnostic, medical therapeutic, research, scientific), manufacturing · New York

CSH STC Site

Canandaigua, NY · ~30 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CSH STC Site runs at 100% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Irradiation apparatus and tubes (e.g., industrial, medical diagnostic, medical therapeutic, research, scientific), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

CSH STC Site: 3.3 TCR = 100% of Irradiation apparatus and tubes (e.g., industrial, medical diagnostic, medical therapeutic, research, scientific), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CSH STC Site safety composite

CSH STC Site scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.1

2016→2019

CSH STC Site injury rate improved

CSH STC Site's TCR fell 7.1 from 7.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 7.1 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.1 · 2017=3.1 · 2018=3.0 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334517 · Canandaigua, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.3 · 100% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #10/10
  • PHOTO Golden Engineering, …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Golden Engineering, Inc. (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

CSH STC Site in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CSH STC Site averages 3.3 TCR (100% of the Irradiation apparatus and tubes (e.g., industrial, medical diagnostic, medical therapeutic, research, scientific), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CSH STC Site TCR series: 2016=7.1 · 2017=3.1 · 2018=3 · 2019=0 · BLS 3.3

Where CSH STC Site falls in its industry

60 Irradiation apparatus and tube establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 10 Irradiation apparatus and tube employers in New York.

CSH STC Site (30 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate CSH STC Site
CSH STC Site (30 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.2

CSH STC Site has fewer employees than the Irradiation apparatus and tubes (e.g., i median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2017 3.1 0.0 1 0 0
2016 7.1 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334517 · NY · Canandaigua

60 Irradiation apparatus and tubes (e.g., industrial, medical diagnostic, medical therapeutic, research, scientific), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 59 employers in Canandaigua, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Golden Engineering, Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Qfix - Church Rd 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Isoray Medical 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Smiths Detection Alcoa 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hemdale Farms Inc 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE My Forest Foods 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Part 2 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE W.W. Patterson, Inc. 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thompson Hospital 1,985 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hospital 1,816 FTE
CITY-NEAR Frederick Ferris Thompson Hospital 1,710 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pactiv Canandaigua Manufacturing Plant 507 FTE
NAT-TCR Medical Center Lodge 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Home Health of Illinois 36-4206223 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR ILJIN Slewing 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Tenet Coral Gables Hosp Evs 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Valley Communications Center 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Parks at Arlington 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE PTCO Redding 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tlc home health of Ohio, Inc. 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.