Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Texas

CSL Harlingen Court, LLC

Harlingen, TX · ~73 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CSL Harlingen Court, LLC runs at 247% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

CSL Harlingen Court, LLC: 9.4 TCR = 247% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CSL Harlingen Court, LLC safety composite

CSL Harlingen Court, LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 9.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−306.6

2021→2024

CSL Harlingen Court, LLC injury rate improved

CSL Harlingen Court, LLC's TCR fell 306.6 from 312.0 in 2021 to 5.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 312.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.38× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=312.0 · 2022=8.4 · 2023=14.3 · 2024=5.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Harlingen, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.4 · 247% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #329/470
  • PHOTO Roses & Ivy Elder Ca…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Roses & Ivy Elder Care, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

CSL Harlingen Court, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CSL Harlingen Court, LLC averages 9.4 TCR (247% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CSL Harlingen Court, LLC TCR series: 2021=312 · 2022=8.4 · 2023=14.3 · 2024=5.4 · BLS 3.8

Where CSL Harlingen Court, LLC falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #329 safest of 470 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Texas.

CSL Harlingen Court, LLC (73 employees, TCR 9.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate CSL Harlingen Court, LLC
CSL Harlingen Court, LLC (73 employees, TCR 9.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

CSL Harlingen Court, LLC has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.4 3.6 3 0 0
2023 14.3 14.3 8 0 0
2022 8.4 8.4 5 0 0
2021 312.0 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · TX · Harlingen

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 133 employers in Harlingen, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Roses & Ivy Elder Care, Inc. 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Peregrine Senior Living at Onondaga Hill 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10688 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Villas of South Park 9.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eden Green Technology 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Treesap Farms LLC - Mill Creek 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE T-Rey Properties Inc. 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - South District Houston 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4701-838 1,389 FTE
CITY-NEAR Harlingen Medical Center 661 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX_Harlingen_2921 S. Expswy 83_TCIP2T20 553 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 595 354 FTE
NAT-TCR Sonesta Charlotte 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Douglasville Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Jack in the Box 3273 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Cedar Falls Ia - 3302 9.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE 6203 Berlin 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4502 Rutland 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE CSL Flagstaff 2019, LLC 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE 8527 Thomaston 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.