Agents, laundry and drycleaning · New York

Cudney's Launderers & Dry Cleaners

Saratoga Springs, NY · ~22 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cudney's Launderers & Dry Cleaners runs at 129% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Agents, laundry and drycleaning workplace, earning a grade D.

Cudney's Launderers & Dry Cleaners: 2.7 TCR = 129% of Agents, laundry and drycleaning BLS 2.1 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cudney's Launderers & Dry Cleaners safety composite

Cudney's Launderers & Dry Cleaners scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Cudney's Launderers & Dry Cleaners held a steady TCR band

Cudney's Launderers & Dry Cleaners's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 7.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=4.8 · 2020=7.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=7.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 812320 · Saratoga Springs, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 2.7 · 129% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #9/14
  • PHOTO CLS - Winston-Salem
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CLS - Winston-Salem (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Cudney's Launderers & Dry Cleaners in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cudney's Launderers & Dry Cleaners averages 2.7 TCR (129% of the Agents, laundry and drycleaning BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cudney's Launderers & Dry Cleaners TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=4.8 · 2020=7 · 2022=0 · 2023=7 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.1

Where Cudney's Launderers & Dry Cleaners falls in its industry

193 Agents, laundry and drycleanin establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 14 Agents, laundry and drycleanin employers in New York.

Cudney's Launderers & Dry Cleaners (22 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Cudney's Launderers & Dry Cleaners
Cudney's Launderers & Dry Cleaners (22 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Cudney's Launderers & Dry Cleaners has fewer employees than the Agents, laundry and drycleaning median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 7.0 7.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 7.0 7.0 1 0 0
2018 4.8 4.8 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

812320 · NY · Saratoga Springs

193 Agents, laundry and drycleaning employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 69 employers in Saratoga Springs, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CLS - Winston-Salem 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR French Cleaners 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Russell's Cleaning Services 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR L & N Costume Services Inc 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Turek Farms Management Inc. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Progressive Cattle LLC 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ridgecrest Dairy 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Affinity Agriculture LLC 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR AIM Services INC 2,719 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saratoga Hospital 2,139 FTE
CITY-NEAR SARATOGA NY 561 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wesley Health Care Center, Inc. 494 FTE
NAT-TCR McCarthy Masonry and Concrete Inc 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Boys Electrical Contractors LLC Melbourne 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Firestorm Wildland Fire Suppression Inc. 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Corporate 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE BAC Inc 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fwh LLC 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Highway Department 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Schmid Pipeline Construction Inc 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.