Home care of elderly, non-medical · California

Culver City / Westside

Culver City, CA · ~1,282 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Culver City / Westside runs at 37% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Home care of elderly, non-medical workplace, earning a grade A.

Culver City / Westside: 1.4 TCR = 37% of Home care of elderly, non-medical BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Culver City / Westside safety composite

Culver City / Westside scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2018→2023

Culver City / Westside injury rate improved

Culver City / Westside's TCR fell 1.8 from 2.7 in 2018 to 0.9 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.58× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=2.7 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=0.2 · 2023=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Culver City, CA AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 37% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #20/230
  • PHOTO LECOM Center for Hea…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 41 inj
  • SIZE ~1,282 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LECOM Center for Health and Aging (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Culver City / Westside in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Culver City / Westside averages 1.4 TCR (37% of the Home care of elderly, non-medical BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Culver City / Westside TCR series: 2018=2.7 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=0.2 · 2023=0.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Culver City / Westside falls in its industry

1,320 Home care of elderly, non-medi establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 230 Home care of elderly, non-medi employers in California.

Culver City / Westside (1,282 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Culver City / Westside
Culver City / Westside (1,282 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Culver City / Westside has more employees than the Home care of elderly, non-medical median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.9 0.8 11 0 0
2022 0.2 0.2 2 0 0
2021 1.9 1.6 15 4 0
2018 2.7 2.1 13 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · CA · Culver City

1,320 Home care of elderly, non-medical employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 94 employers in Culver City, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LECOM Center for Health and Aging 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR United Partners In Care LLC. 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR CCSI-Swansea 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shawnee Plus 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE 53050 CUR HOTEL DEL CORONADO CA 1,282 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chukchansi Gold Resort & Casino 1,282 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fremont 1 1,283 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2261-00000310 1,283 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sony Pictures Entertainment 3,516 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 567 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - CULVER CITY 1,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR Southern California Hospital at Culver City 992 FTE
NAT-TCR Sunset Produce, LLC 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Unit #2498 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Unit #2797 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Bolling Commissary Grocery Retail 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE 826 - EFC4 DeSoto, TX 1,282 FTE
NAT-SIZE University of Illinois Springfield 1,282 FTE
NAT-SIZE St Vincent Hospital Hot Springs 1,282 FTE
NAT-SIZE Our Lady of Bellefonte Hospital 1,282 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.