General freight trucking, local · Massachusetts

Cumberland Farms Chelsea Drivers

Chelsea, MA · ~31 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.7
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cumberland Farms Chelsea Drivers runs at 126% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General freight trucking, local workplace, earning a grade D.

Cumberland Farms Chelsea Drivers: 5.7 TCR = 126% of General freight trucking, local BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cumberland Farms Chelsea Drivers safety composite

Cumberland Farms Chelsea Drivers scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Cumberland Farms Chelsea Drivers: 5.3 → 6.1 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 9.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.07× in 2021

Cumberland Farms Chelsea Drivers's TCR rose 0.8 from 5.3 in 2016 to 6.1 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 9.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 1.07× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484110 · Chelsea, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.7 · 126% of ind

  • DART 6.1 DART
  • RANK #18/43
  • PHOTO Flint Creek Transpor…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Flint Creek Transport LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Cumberland Farms Chelsea Drivers in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cumberland Farms Chelsea Drivers averages 5.7 TCR (126% of the General freight trucking, local BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cumberland Farms Chelsea Drivers TCR series: 2016=5.3 · 2017=2.8 · 2018=5.6 · 2019=5.2 · 2020=9.1 · 2021=6.1 · BLS 4.5

Where Cumberland Farms Chelsea Drivers falls in its industry

2,784 General freight trucking, loca establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 43 General freight trucking, loca employers in Massachusetts.

Cumberland Farms Chelsea Drivers (31 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Cumberland Farms Chelsea Drivers
Cumberland Farms Chelsea Drivers (31 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Cumberland Farms Chelsea Drivers has fewer employees than the General freight trucking, local median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 6.1 6.1 2 0 0
2020 9.1 6.1 3 0 0
2019 5.2 2.6 2 0 0
2018 5.6 2.8 2 0 0
2017 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2016 5.3 2.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484110 · MA · Chelsea

2,784 General freight trucking, local employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 52 employers in Chelsea, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Flint Creek Transport LLC 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR APPLETON (WIKAU) 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Weaver Bros., Inc. Anchorage Terminal 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Operative Cake 5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE MILLBURY LEARNING CENTER-MA22 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE One Tech Circle 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Raffles Unit 28C 40 Trinity Place 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Biotech Builders Group 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Market Basket #32 683 FTE
CITY-NEAR State Garden, Inc. 425 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kayem Foods, Inc 308 FTE
CITY-NEAR 240055-BOS-CHELSEA CARRIER ANNEX 284 FTE
NAT-TCR 49211a - Brisbane Dc 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Store #135 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Ideal Manufacturing 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 600 - Taylor Entrance Systems 5.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ruan Transport Corporation T-081 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lile Relocation Services - Corporate Office 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ruan Transport Corporation T-309 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Water Technologies and Solutions : Addison 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.