Outpatient mental health centers and clinics (except hospitals) · Indiana

Cummins Behavioral Health Systems, Inc.

Avon, IN · ~375 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cummins Behavioral Health Systems, Inc. runs at 28% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Outpatient mental health centers and clinics (except hospitals) workplace, earning a grade A.

Cummins Behavioral Health Systems, Inc.: 1.1 TCR = 28% of Outpatient mental health centers and clinics (except hospitals) BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cummins Behavioral Health Systems, Inc. safety composite

Cummins Behavioral Health Systems, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2016→2017

Cummins Behavioral Health Systems, Inc. injury rate improved

Cummins Behavioral Health Systems, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.0 from 1.6 in 2016 to 0.5 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.6 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.6 · 2017=0.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621420 · Avon, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 28% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #5/43
  • PHOTO Administration Build…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~375 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Administration Building (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Cummins Behavioral Health Systems, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cummins Behavioral Health Systems, Inc. averages 1.1 TCR (28% of the Outpatient mental health centers and clinics (except hospitals) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cummins Behavioral Health Systems, Inc. TCR series: 2016=1.6 · 2017=0.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Cummins Behavioral Health Systems, Inc. falls in its industry

611 Outpatient mental health cente establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 43 Outpatient mental health cente employers in Indiana.

Cummins Behavioral Health Systems, Inc. (375 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Cummins Behavioral Health Systems, Inc.
Cummins Behavioral Health Systems, Inc. (375 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Cummins Behavioral Health Systems, Inc. has more employees than the Outpatient mental health centers and cli median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 0.5 0.5 2 0 0
2016 1.6 0.6 3 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621420 · IN · Avon

611 Outpatient mental health centers and clinics (except hospitals) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 59 employers in Avon, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Administration Building 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lakeview Main Campus 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brighter Heights of Oklahoma 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 06-Tampa 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE 228 LCI 375 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3529 375 FTE
STATE-SIZE Children's Bureau 375 FTE
STATE-SIZE Electric Plus Inc 374 FTE
CITY-NEAR West Hospital 1,427 FTE
CITY-NEAR Avon Community School Corporation 1,356 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health West Hospital, Inc. 1,240 FTE
CITY-NEAR Main Office 2 - 02 546 FTE
NAT-TCR N and R of Columbia LLC 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Piper Plastic Illinois 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 1588 D&W -Portage MI FF LLC #38-2750461 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Structural #76 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rocklin Center (Caroc) 375 FTE
NAT-SIZE GDIT Chesapeake Crossways Blvd 375 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corporate Office 375 FTE
NAT-SIZE Prairie St. John's 375 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.