General warehousing and storage · Texas

Cummins Inc. Dallas Regional Distribution Center

Dallas, TX · ~61 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cummins Inc. Dallas Regional Distribution Center runs at 23% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade A.

Cummins Inc. Dallas Regional Distribution Center: 1.4 TCR = 23% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cummins Inc. Dallas Regional Distribution Center safety composite

Cummins Inc. Dallas Regional Distribution Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Cummins Inc. Dallas Regional Distribution Center: 0.0 → 3.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 3.4 TCR · DART/TCR 2.49× in 2024

Cummins Inc. Dallas Regional Distribution Center's TCR rose 3.4 from 0.0 in 2016 to 3.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2.49× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Dallas, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 23% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #185/846
  • PHOTO Holman Distribution …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Holman Distribution Centers - MSDC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Cummins Inc. Dallas Regional Distribution Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cummins Inc. Dallas Regional Distribution Center averages 1.4 TCR (23% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Cummins Inc. Dallas Regional Distribution Center TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2023=2 · 2024=3.4 · BLS 5.8

Where Cummins Inc. Dallas Regional Distribution Center falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #185 safest of 846 General warehousing and storag employers in Texas.

Cummins Inc. Dallas Regional Distribution Center (61 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Cummins Inc. Dallas Regional Distribution Center
Cummins Inc. Dallas Regional Distribution Center (61 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Cummins Inc. Dallas Regional Distribution Center has fewer employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.4 3.4 2 0 0
2023 2.0 2.0 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · TX · Dallas

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,187 employers in Dallas, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Holman Distribution Centers - MSDC 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR WM 6494 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plainfield, IN (Whirlpool) 428 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Newell Brands - Olathe, KS 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bumblebee Logistics LLC 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMZL-NA : Gold Wing Delivery, LLC 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE San Antonio Vending 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMZL-NA : Syntrik 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR AECOM DCS (US Operations) 15,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rexel USA, Inc 8,356 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1 CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENTER OF DALLAS 6,147 FTE
CITY-NEAR HDQ - Headquarters 5,764 FTE
NAT-TCR The Ryan Company, Inc 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Design Resource Services, Inc 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Ohio Coatings Company 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Pierce Biotechnology, Inc 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fred Anderson Acquisition Company, LLC 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Real Simple Ideas 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atlanta Regional Distribution Center 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Avamere at Rio Rancho 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.