Capacitors, electronic, fixed and variable, manufacturing · New York

Current Controls, Inc.

Wellsville, NY · ~63 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Current Controls, Inc. runs at 36% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Capacitors, electronic, fixed and variable, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Current Controls, Inc.: 1.2 TCR = 36% of Capacitors, electronic, fixed and variable, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Current Controls, Inc. safety composite

Current Controls, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Current Controls, Inc.: 2.8 → 4.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 4.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.87× in 2024

Current Controls, Inc.'s TCR rose 1.6 from 2.8 in 2016 to 4.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.87× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334416 · Wellsville, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 36% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #6/16
  • PHOTO PowerVolt, Inc
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PowerVolt, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Current Controls, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Current Controls, Inc. averages 1.2 TCR (36% of the Capacitors, electronic, fixed and variable, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Current Controls, Inc. TCR series: 2016=2.8 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=4.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Current Controls, Inc. falls in its industry

134 Capacitors, electronic, fixed establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 16 Capacitors, electronic, fixed employers in New York.

Current Controls, Inc. (63 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 2.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Current Controls, Inc.
Current Controls, Inc. (63 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 2.1

Current Controls, Inc. has fewer employees than the Capacitors, electronic, fixed and variab median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.4 2.2 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2019 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.8 2.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334416 · NY · Wellsville

134 Capacitors, electronic, fixed and variable, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 34 employers in Wellsville, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PowerVolt, Inc 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prem Magnetics, Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR American Technical Ceramics Jacksonville 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR International Manufacturing Services, Inc. 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE AMC East Ave 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE NY State Solar HQ 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fresh Kills Substation 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE KJJ Industries LLC 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR Otis Eastern Service, LLC 461 FTE
CITY-NEAR Otis Minnesota Services, LLC 454 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jones Memorial Hospital 404 FTE
CITY-NEAR Arvos Ljungstrom LLC 311 FTE
NAT-TCR Beaumont Office 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Basalite - Dixon 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Decatur BioProducts 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR National Coney Island - 8 & Harper 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE San Jose Field Office 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Titan Delivery LLC. 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lighting Retrofit International 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kamps Pallets Taylor 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.