Engines and parts (except diesel), automotive and truck, manufacturing · Indiana

Curtis Maruyasu America Inc

Santa Claus, IN · ~29 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Curtis Maruyasu America Inc runs at 47% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Engines and parts (except diesel), automotive and truck, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Curtis Maruyasu America Inc: 2.5 TCR = 47% of Engines and parts (except diesel), automotive and truck, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Curtis Maruyasu America Inc safety composite

Curtis Maruyasu America Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Curtis Maruyasu America Inc held a steady TCR band

Curtis Maruyasu America Inc's TCR held near 0.3 from 3.7 in 2022 to 4.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=3.7 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=4.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336310 · Santa Claus, IN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 2.5 · 47% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #7/17
  • PHOTO RYE-Cup
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: RYE-Cup (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Curtis Maruyasu America Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Curtis Maruyasu America Inc averages 2.5 TCR (47% of the Engines and parts (except diesel), automotive and truck, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Curtis Maruyasu America Inc TCR series: 2022=3.7 · 2023=0 · 2024=4 · BLS 5.4

Where Curtis Maruyasu America Inc falls in its industry

221 Engines and parts (except dies establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 17 Engines and parts (except dies employers in Indiana.

Curtis Maruyasu America Inc (29 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 165 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Curtis Maruyasu America Inc
Curtis Maruyasu America Inc (29 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 165 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Curtis Maruyasu America Inc has fewer employees than the Engines and parts (except diesel), autom median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.0 4.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.7 3.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336310 · IN · Santa Claus

221 Engines and parts (except diesel), automotive and truck, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 8 employers in Santa Claus, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR RYE-Cup 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Race Winning Brands 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Phillips & Temro 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Precision Turbo and Engine 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Calf Land LLC 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE LeMaster Steel Erectors Inc. - Noblesville 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE 640-NiSource-Kokomo IN-Home Ave 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - Clarksville 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Koch Development Corporation 757 FTE
CITY-NEAR National Office Furniture 283 FTE
CITY-NEAR LAKE RUDOLPH CAMPGROUND & RV RESORT 101 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wesselman's Supermarkets 97 FTE
NAT-TCR Hampton Inn Binghamton-Johnson City 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Berkel Shoring Atlanta 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR SITECON Corporation 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Hickory 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hively Landscapes 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Modern Ag Distribution Center 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of North Bend - North Bend Fire Department 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Big R of Roswell, LLC. 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.