Gasoline engine parts, mechanical, automotive and truck, manufacturing · Kentucky

Curtis-Maruyasu America, Inc.

Lebanon, KY · ~658 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Curtis-Maruyasu America, Inc. runs at 70% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Gasoline engine parts, mechanical, automotive and truck, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Curtis-Maruyasu America, Inc.: 3.8 TCR = 70% of Gasoline engine parts, mechanical, automotive and truck, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Curtis-Maruyasu America, Inc. safety composite

Curtis-Maruyasu America, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2016→2020

Curtis-Maruyasu America, Inc. injury rate improved

Curtis-Maruyasu America, Inc.'s TCR fell 0.6 from 4.2 in 2016 to 3.5 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.3 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.66× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.2 · 2018=4.3 · 2019=3.0 · 2020=3.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336310 · Lebanon, KY AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 3.8 · 70% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #10/14
  • PHOTO Sanoh-America
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 109 inj
  • SIZE ~658 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sanoh-America (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

Curtis-Maruyasu America, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Curtis-Maruyasu America, Inc. averages 3.8 TCR (70% of the Gasoline engine parts, mechanical, automotive and truck, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Curtis-Maruyasu America, Inc. TCR series: 2016=4.2 · 2018=4.3 · 2019=3 · 2020=3.5 · BLS 5.4

Where Curtis-Maruyasu America, Inc. falls in its industry

221 Gasoline engine parts, mechani establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 14 Gasoline engine parts, mechani employers in Kentucky.

Curtis-Maruyasu America, Inc. (658 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 165 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Curtis-Maruyasu America, Inc.
Curtis-Maruyasu America, Inc. (658 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 165 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Curtis-Maruyasu America, Inc. has more employees than the Gasoline engine parts, mechanical, autom median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 3.5 2.5 16 4 0
2019 3.0 2.5 23 1 0
2018 4.3 3.1 35 3 0
2016 4.2 3.2 35 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336310 · KY · Lebanon

221 Gasoline engine parts, mechanical, automotive and truck, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 45 employers in Lebanon, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sanoh-America 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kaydon Ring and Seal 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grand Rapids Operations 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dart Machinery 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE American Fuji Seal 660 FTE
STATE-SIZE Methodist Hospital main campus 660 FTE
STATE-SIZE KYVLE - SCS 1860 OUTER LOOP - 3756 655 FTE
STATE-SIZE Saint Joseph London 655 FTE
CITY-NEAR TG Kentucky LLC 1,066 FTE
CITY-NEAR Toyoda Gosei Kentucky 1,052 FTE
CITY-NEAR Curtis Maruyasu America 522 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kentucky Cooperage 447 FTE
NAT-TCR International Magnet School 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Storage & Processors 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Stonebridge at Burlington 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Ross store 1706 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ponca City Refinery 658 FTE
NAT-SIZE Attentive Care of Albany, Inc. 658 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gates Corporation 658 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sharp Mesa Vista Hospital 658 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.