Pipe fabricating (i.e., bending, cutting, threading) made from purchased metal pipe · New Jersey

Custom Alloy Corporation

High Bridge, NJ · ~250 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Custom Alloy Corporation runs at 182% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Pipe fabricating (i.e., bending, cutting, threading) made from purchased metal pipe workplace, earning a grade D.

Custom Alloy Corporation: 6.0 TCR = 182% of Pipe fabricating (i.e., bending, cutting, threading) made from purchased metal pipe BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Custom Alloy Corporation safety composite

Custom Alloy Corporation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2017→2022

Custom Alloy Corporation injury rate improved

Custom Alloy Corporation's TCR fell 0.9 from 5.6 in 2017 to 4.7 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 9.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.6 · 2018=9.7 · 2019=4.9 · 2020=6.0 · 2021=5.1 · 2022=4.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332996 · High Bridge, NJ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.0 · 182% of ind

  • DART 3.3 DART
  • RANK P24
  • PHOTO Overstreet Hughes Co…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 93 inj
  • SIZE ~250 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Overstreet Hughes Co., Inc. dba Fabricated Tube Products (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Custom Alloy Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Custom Alloy Corporation averages 6.0 TCR (182% of the Pipe fabricating (i.e., bending, cutting, threading) made from purchased metal pipe BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Custom Alloy Corporation TCR series: 2017=5.6 · 2018=9.7 · 2019=4.9 · 2020=6 · 2021=5.1 · 2022=4.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Custom Alloy Corporation falls in its industry

337 Pipe fabricating (i.e., bendin establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Custom Alloy Corporation (250 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Custom Alloy Corporation
Custom Alloy Corporation (250 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Custom Alloy Corporation has more employees than the Pipe fabricating (i.e., bending, cutting median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 4.7 3.3 8 2 0
2021 5.1 4.7 11 1 0
2020 6.0 2.8 15 2 0
2019 4.9 3.5 14 0 0
2018 9.7 7.9 30 2 0
2017 5.6 3.4 15 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332996 · NJ · High Bridge

337 Pipe fabricating (i.e., bending, cutting, threading) made from purchased metal pipe employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 3 employers in High Bridge, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Overstreet Hughes Co., Inc. dba Fabricated Tube Products 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Core Pipe Products, Inc. - Florida 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Ford Meter Box Company, Inc. (Pell City) 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Propipe Technologies, Inc. 6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE MPS South Plainfield 250 FTE
STATE-SIZE Groupe SEB USA - Millville 250 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lockheed Martin Corporation US NJ Cherry Hill Exec Campus (1834) 250 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hackensack, NJ 250 FTE
CITY-NEAR XP Power - High Bridge 158 FTE
CITY-NEAR TMS-CAC High Bridge 137 FTE
NAT-TCR TAC Air - APA 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Tops 212 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR S03826 - WM of IL SW (Rockdale Satellite) 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Maxwell Construction 6.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Caesarstone Technologies, USA Inc. 250 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kansas City (Headquarters) 250 FTE
NAT-SIZE Howden Roots LLC 250 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clayton Homes Savannah 250 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.