Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · Texas

CustomerFirstLogisticsLLC

Venus, TX · ~73 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CustomerFirstLogisticsLLC runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade C.

CustomerFirstLogisticsLLC: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CustomerFirstLogisticsLLC safety composite

CustomerFirstLogisticsLLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

86/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

CustomerFirstLogisticsLLC held a steady TCR band

CustomerFirstLogisticsLLC's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 0.0 TCR.

2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Venus, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/463
  • PHOTO Binghamton
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Binghamton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

CustomerFirstLogisticsLLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CustomerFirstLogisticsLLC averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CustomerFirstLogisticsLLC TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 6.5

Where CustomerFirstLogisticsLLC falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 463 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in Texas.

CustomerFirstLogisticsLLC (73 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate CustomerFirstLogisticsLLC
CustomerFirstLogisticsLLC (73 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

CustomerFirstLogisticsLLC has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · TX · Venus

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 7 employers in Venus, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Binghamton 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Detroit 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Port Chester 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Richmond East 0.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eden Green Technology 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Treesap Farms LLC - Mill Creek 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE T-Rey Properties Inc. 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - South District Houston 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR BLACKHAWK TRANSPORT VENUS TX 185 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steeltex 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hughes Tank Company LLC 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rabine Paving Texas 33 FTE
NAT-TCR Matt Bowers Ford Metairie 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Matt Bowers Nissan EasternShore 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Conway 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Creekside 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE DJE9 Lyfeline Logistics Management 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lighting Innovations, Inc. DBA FC Lighting, Inc. 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE George Jue Manufacturing Co Inc 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Delta Air Lines - MSN 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.