Precast concrete products (except brick, block, pipe) manufacturing · Idaho

CXT Nampa Concrete Products

Nampa, ID · ~83 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CXT Nampa Concrete Products runs at 47% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Precast concrete products (except brick, block, pipe) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

CXT Nampa Concrete Products: 1.6 TCR = 47% of Precast concrete products (except brick, block, pipe) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CXT Nampa Concrete Products safety composite

CXT Nampa Concrete Products scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2021→2024

CXT Nampa Concrete Products injury rate improved

CXT Nampa Concrete Products's TCR fell 1.9 from 2.9 in 2021 to 0.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 2.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=2.9 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327390 · Nampa, ID AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 47% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/6
  • PHOTO Reno Plant
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~83 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Reno Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Idaho employers → · Look up another →

CXT Nampa Concrete Products in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CXT Nampa Concrete Products averages 1.6 TCR (47% of the Precast concrete products (except brick, block, pipe) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CXT Nampa Concrete Products TCR series: 2021=2.9 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=0 · 2024=0.9 · BLS 3.3

Where CXT Nampa Concrete Products falls in its industry

790 Precast concrete products (exc establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Idaho alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 6 Precast concrete products (exc employers in Idaho.

CXT Nampa Concrete Products (83 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate CXT Nampa Concrete Products
CXT Nampa Concrete Products (83 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 4.6

CXT Nampa Concrete Products has more employees than the Precast concrete products (except brick, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.9 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.4 1.2 2 0 0
2021 2.9 1.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327390 · ID · Nampa

790 Precast concrete products (except brick, block, pipe) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,774 rated employers in Idaho with headcount on file · 228 employers in Nampa, ID · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Reno Plant 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR TPAC adivision of EnCon united 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wilbert Burial Vault Co. 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Environmental StoneWorks- Denver 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Midway Dairy LLC 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brighton Corporation 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blue Sky Construction LLC 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sloan Security Group, INC 83 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BOI2 2,940 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Alphonsus Medical Center, Nampa (Garrity)-SAHS-ID/OR 1,047 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Alphonsus Medical Center Nampa 922 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lactalis Nampa 863 FTE
NAT-TCR Shawano Recycling Center 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Arbor Ridge at Brookmeade Community 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Clean Harbors Environmental Services Inc 37CQ 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR LaPorte/Springville 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Wornall Place 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Automann - California 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arbors at Delaware 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Warehouse-Office Knoxville TN 83 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.