Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction · Illinois

D1 Eisenhower Yard

Chicago, IL · ~23 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
23.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

D1 Eisenhower Yard runs at 842% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction workplace, earning a grade F.

D1 Eisenhower Yard: 23.6 TCR = 842% of Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

D1 Eisenhower Yard safety composite

D1 Eisenhower Yard scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 23.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 14.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.6

2017→2024

D1 Eisenhower Yard injury rate improved

D1 Eisenhower Yard's TCR fell 11.6 from 26.0 in 2017 to 14.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 35.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.61× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=26.0 · 2018=35.1 · 2019=16.9 · 2020=35.6 · 2021=23.5 · 2022=26.8 · 2023=10.2 · 2024=14.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Chicago, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 23.6 · 842% of ind

  • DART 14.4 DART
  • RANK #262/266
  • PHOTO Department of Public…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 35 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Department of Public Services (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

D1 Eisenhower Yard in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows D1 Eisenhower Yard averages 23.6 TCR (842% of the Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

D1 Eisenhower Yard TCR series: 2017=26 · 2018=35.1 · 2019=16.9 · 2020=35.6 · 2021=23.5 · 2022=26.8 · 2023=10.2 · 2024=14.4 · BLS 2.8

Where D1 Eisenhower Yard falls in its industry

4,078 Highway, Street, and Bridge Co establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #262 safest of 266 Highway, Street, and Bridge Co employers in Illinois.

D1 Eisenhower Yard (23 employees, TCR 23.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate D1 Eisenhower Yard
D1 Eisenhower Yard (23 employees, TCR 23.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

D1 Eisenhower Yard has fewer employees than the Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 14.4 14.4 3 0 0
2023 10.2 10.2 2 0 0
2022 26.8 26.8 5 0 0
2021 23.5 14.1 3 2 0
2020 35.6 25.4 7 0 0
2019 16.9 16.9 3 0 0
2018 35.1 30.1 7 0 0
2017 26.0 15.6 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · IL · Chicago

4,078 Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 2,934 employers in Chicago, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Department of Public Services 23.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR D5 Leverett Yard 23.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Schermer Construction Inc 23.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Honolulu Corporation Yard 23.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Oak Grove 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eagle Point Farms, LLC. 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mendota Office 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nokomis Area Fire Protection District 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago Public Schools 49,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago/Corporate 18,831 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Illinois at Chicago 13,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Service UIC UIC Campus 12,732 FTE
NAT-TCR Store 1163 23.6 TCR
NAT-TCR HG225 23.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Bozeman Partners, LLC 23.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 340 ABC Supply Co., Inc 23.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lansing Building Products - Knoxville TN 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Deep Foundation, Inc. 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mills Ford Chrysler 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Berger Company Factory 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.