Air-conditioners, unit (e.g., motor home, travel trailer, window), manufacturing · Minnesota

Daikin Applied Owatonna

Owatonna, MN · ~539 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Daikin Applied Owatonna runs at 71% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Air-conditioners, unit (e.g., motor home, travel trailer, window), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Daikin Applied Owatonna: 2.3 TCR = 71% of Air-conditioners, unit (e.g., motor home, travel trailer, window), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Daikin Applied Owatonna safety composite

Daikin Applied Owatonna scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Daikin Applied Owatonna held a steady TCR band

Daikin Applied Owatonna's TCR held near 0.2 from 2.0 in 2022 to 2.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 2.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.94× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=2.0 · 2023=2.8 · 2024=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333415 · Owatonna, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 71% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #9/22
  • PHOTO Commercial HVAC Amer…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~539 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Commercial HVAC Americas : MFG-Ft. Smith, AR-USA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Daikin Applied Owatonna in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Daikin Applied Owatonna averages 2.3 TCR (71% of the Air-conditioners, unit (e.g., motor home, travel trailer, window), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Daikin Applied Owatonna TCR series: 2022=2 · 2023=2.8 · 2024=2.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Daikin Applied Owatonna falls in its industry

461 Air-conditioners, unit (e.g., establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 22 Air-conditioners, unit (e.g., employers in Minnesota.

Daikin Applied Owatonna (539 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 164 employees and a TCR of 2.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Daikin Applied Owatonna
Daikin Applied Owatonna (539 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 164 employees and a TCR of 2.8

Daikin Applied Owatonna has more employees than the Air-conditioners, unit (e.g., motor home median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.2 2.2 11 0 0
2023 2.8 1.2 14 0 0
2022 2.0 1.3 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333415 · MN · Owatonna

461 Air-conditioners, unit (e.g., motor home, travel trailer, window), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 122 employers in Owatonna, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Commercial HVAC Americas : MFG-Ft. Smith, AR-USA 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mastercool, Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Thermo Fisher Scientific (Asheville), LLC 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Suburban MFG 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE UMMC Mayo Building 539 FTE
STATE-SIZE AmesburyTruth - Owatonna 537 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lake Superior College 537 FTE
STATE-SIZE Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company 536 FTE
CITY-NEAR Downtown & Remote 1,694 FTE
CITY-NEAR 27-321862189 1,465 FTE
CITY-NEAR Viracon 1,084 FTE
CITY-NEAR Truth Hardware 631 FTE
NAT-TCR Vancrest of Payne 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Virginia Services, INC 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 148 - SR 32 Eastgate 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Franklin Water Treatment - Churubusco 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE QuantumScape Battery, Inc. SJ1 539 FTE
NAT-SIZE Elmers Crane and Dozer Inc 539 FTE
NAT-SIZE Charlotte NC FXFE-CLT 539 FTE
NAT-SIZE Columbia Machine, Inc. 539 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.