Food-processing machinery and equipment merchant wholesalers · Colorado

Dairy Engineering Company

Arvada, CO · ~48 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.1
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dairy Engineering Company runs at 321% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Food-processing machinery and equipment merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

Dairy Engineering Company: 7.1 TCR = 321% of Food-processing machinery and equipment merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dairy Engineering Company safety composite

Dairy Engineering Company scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Dairy Engineering Company: 3.7 → 11.7 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 11.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.38× in 2024

Dairy Engineering Company's TCR rose 7.9 from 3.7 in 2019 to 11.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 11.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.38× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423830 · Arvada, CO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.1 · 321% of ind

  • DART 9.7 DART
  • RANK #14/15
  • PHOTO Tri-Lift NC Greensboro
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tri-Lift NC Greensboro (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Dairy Engineering Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dairy Engineering Company averages 7.1 TCR (321% of the Food-processing machinery and equipment merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dairy Engineering Company TCR series: 2019=3.7 · 2020=3.7 · 2021=11.7 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=7.8 · 2024=11.7 · BLS 2.2

Where Dairy Engineering Company falls in its industry

911 Food-processing machinery and establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 15 Food-processing machinery and employers in Colorado.

Dairy Engineering Company (48 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Dairy Engineering Company
Dairy Engineering Company (48 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Dairy Engineering Company has more employees than the Food-processing machinery and equipment median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.7 9.7 6 0 0
2023 7.8 1.9 4 0 0
2022 3.9 0.0 2 0 0
2021 11.7 0.0 6 0 0
2020 3.7 0.0 2 0 0
2019 3.7 1.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423830 · CO · Arvada

911 Food-processing machinery and equipment merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 129 employers in Arvada, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tri-Lift NC Greensboro 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Barclay Brand Corporation DBA Barclay Brand Ferdon 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Post Holdings 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gosiger Machine Tools, LLC, Indianapolis, IN 7.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Farm Technology Corporation Fram 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rangely Field Office 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Summit Operations Center 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brighton 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sundyne LLC 360 FTE
CITY-NEAR WANCO, Inc. 308 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lumin8 Transportation Technologies, LLC. 298 FTE
CITY-NEAR LivaNova 276 FTE
NAT-TCR Hannula Landscaping and Irrigation, Inc. 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sun Valley Hauling 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Meadowlark Botanical Gardens 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Yogi Bear's Jellystone Park: Golden Valley 7.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Shippensburg Pump Company Inc 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Flex Cell Precision, Inc. 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Signode Industrial Group Plastic Packaging 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Runnings of Lockport 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.