Assembly plants, passenger car, on chassis of own manufacture · Illinois

Dakkota Intergrated Sytems LLC

Chicago, IL · ~663 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dakkota Intergrated Sytems LLC runs at 91% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assembly plants, passenger car, on chassis of own manufacture workplace, earning a grade C.

Dakkota Intergrated Sytems LLC: 3.0 TCR = 91% of Assembly plants, passenger car, on chassis of own manufacture BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dakkota Intergrated Sytems LLC safety composite

Dakkota Intergrated Sytems LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2020→2021

Dakkota Intergrated Sytems LLC injury rate improved

Dakkota Intergrated Sytems LLC's TCR fell 1.8 from 3.9 in 2020 to 2.1 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 3.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=3.9 · 2021=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336111 · Chicago, IL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 91% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #2/6
  • PHOTO ResourceMFG/Toyota M…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~663 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ResourceMFG/Toyota Manufacturing (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Dakkota Intergrated Sytems LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dakkota Intergrated Sytems LLC averages 3.0 TCR (91% of the Assembly plants, passenger car, on chassis of own manufacture BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dakkota Intergrated Sytems LLC TCR series: 2020=3.9 · 2021=2.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Dakkota Intergrated Sytems LLC falls in its industry

158 Assembly plants, passenger car establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 6 Assembly plants, passenger car employers in Illinois.

Dakkota Intergrated Sytems LLC (663 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 366 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05,00010,00015,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Dakkota Intergrated Sytems LLC
Dakkota Intergrated Sytems LLC (663 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 366 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Dakkota Intergrated Sytems LLC has more employees than the Assembly plants, passenger car, on chass median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.1 2.1 10 0 0
2020 3.9 3.5 20 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336111 · IL · Chicago

158 Assembly plants, passenger car, on chassis of own manufacture employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 2,934 employers in Chicago, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ResourceMFG/Toyota Manufacturing 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Driverge - Kansas City 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lucid Motors Tempe 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Metalsa - Owensboro 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE John Deere Global Crop Harvesting Product Development Center 663 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMZL : DIL7 663 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stickney Water Reclamation Plant 664 FTE
STATE-SIZE NOW Foods - Bloomingdale 661 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago Public Schools 49,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago/Corporate 18,831 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Illinois at Chicago 13,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Service UIC UIC Campus 12,732 FTE
NAT-TCR McKinley Campus 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Hansen Kramer Stucco, Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ventura County District Attorney's Office 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR ATK Space Systems Inc Commerce 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Shell Geismar 663 FTE
NAT-SIZE Palo Alto Medical Foundation (378-10155) 663 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6458-ZDUR 663 FTE
NAT-SIZE Scott Electric 663 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.