Maintenance and repair services, aircraft (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) · Texas

Dallas Aeronautical Services

Cedar Hill, TX · ~80 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dallas Aeronautical Services runs at 116% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Maintenance and repair services, aircraft (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) workplace, earning a grade C.

Dallas Aeronautical Services: 5.2 TCR = 116% of Maintenance and repair services, aircraft (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dallas Aeronautical Services safety composite

Dallas Aeronautical Services scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Dallas Aeronautical Services: 3.8 → 10.1 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 10.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.94× in 2020

Dallas Aeronautical Services's TCR rose 6.3 from 3.8 in 2017 to 10.1 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 1.94× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · Cedar Hill, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 5.2 · 116% of ind

  • DART 10.1 DART
  • RANK #72/101
  • PHOTO Yingling Aviation LLC
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~80 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Yingling Aviation LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Dallas Aeronautical Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dallas Aeronautical Services averages 5.2 TCR (116% of the Maintenance and repair services, aircraft (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dallas Aeronautical Services TCR series: 2017=3.8 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=4.3 · 2020=10.1 · BLS 4.5

Where Dallas Aeronautical Services falls in its industry

992 Maintenance and repair service establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #72 safest of 101 Maintenance and repair service employers in Texas.

Dallas Aeronautical Services (80 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Dallas Aeronautical Services
Dallas Aeronautical Services (80 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Dallas Aeronautical Services has more employees than the Maintenance and repair services, aircraf median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 10.1 10.1 0 8 0
2019 4.3 4.3 4 0 0
2018 2.6 1.3 2 0 0
2017 3.8 1.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · TX · Cedar Hill

992 Maintenance and repair services, aircraft (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 54 employers in Cedar Hill, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Yingling Aviation LLC 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR AIRPORT (PAAIR) 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Signature Flight Support Raleigh 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2073-SW-20730147-MX-SW 5.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE STRC Oilfield Technology, LLC 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Edison Plaza 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE YSTA Services, Inc. 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Edinburg Office 80 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3285 381 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3285 379 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1836 - Cedar Hill 235 FTE
CITY-NEAR TOTAL HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE, LLC - CORPORATE 231 FTE
NAT-TCR Highlands Hospital 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Boca Ciega Rehabilitation Center, LLC 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Volunteer Behavioral Health Care Services-Lebanon Cumberland 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Everbrite LLC - Mt. Vernon 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE First Transit 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE 354570-Lancaster Po 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Calacci Construction Company, Inc. 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE United Architectural Metals Inc. - North Canton 80 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.