Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing · Texas

Dallas Airmotive

Dfw Airport, TX · ~474 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dallas Airmotive runs at 24% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Dallas Airmotive: 0.8 TCR = 24% of Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dallas Airmotive safety composite

Dallas Airmotive scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2021→2024

Dallas Airmotive injury rate improved

Dallas Airmotive's TCR fell 0.4 from 1.0 in 2021 to 0.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 1.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=1.0 · 2022=1.0 · 2023=0.6 · 2024=0.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336412 · Dfw Airport, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 24% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #5/20
  • PHOTO PAS Technologies Inc…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~474 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PAS Technologies Inc. dba StandardAero (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Dallas Airmotive in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dallas Airmotive averages 0.8 TCR (24% of the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dallas Airmotive TCR series: 2021=1 · 2022=1 · 2023=0.6 · 2024=0.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Dallas Airmotive falls in its industry

366 Aircraft engine and engine par establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 20 Aircraft engine and engine par employers in Texas.

Dallas Airmotive (474 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Dallas Airmotive
Dallas Airmotive (474 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Dallas Airmotive has more employees than the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.6 0.4 3 0 0
2023 0.6 0.6 3 0 0
2022 1.0 1.0 4 0 0
2021 1.0 0.4 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336412 · TX · Dfw Airport

366 Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 75 employers in Dfw Airport, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PAS Technologies Inc. dba StandardAero 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Supply Chain West Jefferson NC 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Standard Aero Alliance Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Supply Chain : Dayton, OH - Systems 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ole Mexican Foods, Grand Prairie 474 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 964 474 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4186-DC16 474 FTE
STATE-SIZE DI - Ft Worth Corporate Office 474 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-DFW-DALLAS FORT WORTH-DFW-TRML 14,816 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-EA-DFW-DALLAS FORT WORTH-DFW-TRML 4,280 FTE
CITY-NEAR TXDFA - DALLAS/FORT WORTH AIRPORT HUB 2,183 FTE
CITY-NEAR DALLAS/FORT WORTH AIRPORT HUB (TXDFA) 2,123 FTE
NAT-TCR IN - Apple 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Calumet Shreveport Refinery, LLC 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Woodland CA Panel 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR HF Atlanta GA 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE YLEO Distribution Centers 474 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fuse Builds 474 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stryker Salt Lake City 474 FTE
NAT-SIZE TMG Mail Solutions Inc. 474 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.